Reinventing Nature in Kaziranga National Park: A History of Rhinoceros Conservation in Assam, 1948–1974

B. Sarmah
{"title":"Reinventing Nature in Kaziranga National Park: A History of Rhinoceros Conservation in Assam, 1948–1974","authors":"B. Sarmah","doi":"10.4103/cs.cs_143_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A restrictive approach in managing Protected Areas (PA) is often attributed to 'Western' ideas of nature. This view claims that national elites embraced Western ideas of nature—which supposedly has no place for humans—to produce pristine wilderness in PAs by banning grazing, fishing, and foraging inside them. This article foregrounds cultural politics as an alternate driver of creating wilderness in the global south. The article explores the history of conservation of the Greater One-horned Rhino (Rhinoceros unicornis) in Kaziranga Wild Life Sanctuary (KWLS), the previous avatar of Kaziranga National Park in Assam, India. It shows that Assamese cultural politics pertaining to the rhino not only augmented the Assam Forest Department's (FD) enduring efforts to sanitise KWLS from human activities but also paved the way for the militarised protection of the rhino, which in turn, reinforced wilderness. By the late 1960s, when a larger debate about wildlife conservation surfaced in India, developments in KWLS subtly informed exclusionary conservation in other national parks and tiger reserves.","PeriodicalId":376207,"journal":{"name":"Conservation and Society","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_143_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A restrictive approach in managing Protected Areas (PA) is often attributed to 'Western' ideas of nature. This view claims that national elites embraced Western ideas of nature—which supposedly has no place for humans—to produce pristine wilderness in PAs by banning grazing, fishing, and foraging inside them. This article foregrounds cultural politics as an alternate driver of creating wilderness in the global south. The article explores the history of conservation of the Greater One-horned Rhino (Rhinoceros unicornis) in Kaziranga Wild Life Sanctuary (KWLS), the previous avatar of Kaziranga National Park in Assam, India. It shows that Assamese cultural politics pertaining to the rhino not only augmented the Assam Forest Department's (FD) enduring efforts to sanitise KWLS from human activities but also paved the way for the militarised protection of the rhino, which in turn, reinforced wilderness. By the late 1960s, when a larger debate about wildlife conservation surfaced in India, developments in KWLS subtly informed exclusionary conservation in other national parks and tiger reserves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在卡兹兰加国家公园重塑自然:阿萨姆邦犀牛保护的历史,1948-1974
管理保护区(PA)的限制性方法通常归因于“西方”的自然观念。这种观点认为,国家精英们接受了西方的自然观念——自然被认为是没有人类的地方——通过禁止在保护区内放牧、捕鱼和觅食来创造原始的荒野。这篇文章强调文化政治是在全球南方创造荒野的另一个驱动因素。本文探讨了印度阿萨姆邦卡兹兰加国家公园的前身卡兹兰加野生动物保护区(KWLS)保护大独角犀牛(犀牛独角兽)的历史。这表明,阿萨姆邦与犀牛有关的文化政治不仅加强了阿萨姆邦森林部(FD)将KWLS与人类活动隔离开来的持久努力,而且为犀牛的军事化保护铺平了道路,这反过来又加强了荒野。到20世纪60年代末,当一场关于野生动物保护的更大争论在印度浮出水面时,KWLS的发展微妙地影响了其他国家公园和老虎保护区的排他性保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cactus Hunters: Desire and Extinction in the Illicit Succulent Trade Ecological Entanglements: Affect, Embodiment, and Ethics of Care What are the Impacts on Community Wellbeing of Social Relations in Conservation Projects? Medicine Wheel for the Planet: A Journey Towards Personal and Ecological Healing Animals and Epidemics: Interspecies Entanglements in Historical Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1