Compliance with the Use of Medical and Cloth Masks Among Healthcare Workers in Vietnam.

A. Chughtai, H. Seale, T. C. Dung, A. Hayen, B. Rahman, C. Raina MacIntyre
{"title":"Compliance with the Use of Medical and Cloth Masks Among Healthcare Workers in Vietnam.","authors":"A. Chughtai, H. Seale, T. C. Dung, A. Hayen, B. Rahman, C. Raina MacIntyre","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/mew008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nMasks are often worn in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of infection from healthcare workers (HCWs) to patients. Masks are also used to protect the employee from patient-generated infectious organisms but poor compliance can reduce efficacy. The aim of this study was to examine the factors influencing compliance with the use of medical and cloth masks amongst hospital HCWs.\n\n\nMETHODS\nHCWs compliance with the use of medical and cloth masks was measured over a 4-week period in a randomized controlled trial in Vietnam. HCWs were instructed to record their daily activities in diary cards. Demographic, clinical, and diary card data were used to determine the predictors of compliance and the relationship of compliance with infection outcomes.\n\n\nRESULTS\nCompliance rates for both medical and cloth masks decreased during the 4 weeks: medical mask use decreased from 77 to 68% (P < 0.001) and cloth masks from 78 to 69% (P < 0.001). The presence of adverse events (adjusted RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95), and performing aerosol-generating procedures (adjusted RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.82) were negatively associated with compliance, while contact with febrile respiratory illness patients was positively associated (adjusted RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.20). Being compliant with medical or cloth masks use (average use ≥70% of working time) was not associated with clinical respiratory illness, influenza-like illness, and laboratory-confirmed viral infection.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nUnderstanding the factors that affect compliance is important for the occupational health and safety of HCWs. New strategies and tools should be developed to increase compliance of HCWs. The presence of adverse events such as discomfort and breathing problems may be the main reasons for the low compliance with mask use and further studies should be conducted to improve the design/material of masks to improve comfort for the wearer.","PeriodicalId":342592,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mew008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

BACKGROUND Masks are often worn in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of infection from healthcare workers (HCWs) to patients. Masks are also used to protect the employee from patient-generated infectious organisms but poor compliance can reduce efficacy. The aim of this study was to examine the factors influencing compliance with the use of medical and cloth masks amongst hospital HCWs. METHODS HCWs compliance with the use of medical and cloth masks was measured over a 4-week period in a randomized controlled trial in Vietnam. HCWs were instructed to record their daily activities in diary cards. Demographic, clinical, and diary card data were used to determine the predictors of compliance and the relationship of compliance with infection outcomes. RESULTS Compliance rates for both medical and cloth masks decreased during the 4 weeks: medical mask use decreased from 77 to 68% (P < 0.001) and cloth masks from 78 to 69% (P < 0.001). The presence of adverse events (adjusted RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95), and performing aerosol-generating procedures (adjusted RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.82) were negatively associated with compliance, while contact with febrile respiratory illness patients was positively associated (adjusted RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.20). Being compliant with medical or cloth masks use (average use ≥70% of working time) was not associated with clinical respiratory illness, influenza-like illness, and laboratory-confirmed viral infection. CONCLUSION Understanding the factors that affect compliance is important for the occupational health and safety of HCWs. New strategies and tools should be developed to increase compliance of HCWs. The presence of adverse events such as discomfort and breathing problems may be the main reasons for the low compliance with mask use and further studies should be conducted to improve the design/material of masks to improve comfort for the wearer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
越南医护人员使用医用口罩和布口罩的情况
背景:在卫生保健环境中,人们经常佩戴口罩,以防止感染从卫生保健工作者传播给患者。口罩也用于保护员工免受患者产生的传染性微生物的侵害,但依从性差会降低效率。本研究的目的是探讨影响医院医护人员使用医用口罩和布口罩依从性的因素。方法在越南进行一项为期4周的随机对照试验,测量卫生工作者对医用口罩和布口罩使用的依从性。医护人员被要求在日记卡上记录他们的日常活动。使用人口统计学、临床和日记卡数据来确定依从性的预测因素以及依从性与感染结果的关系。结果医用口罩和布制口罩的使用率在4周内均有所下降,医用口罩使用率从77%下降到68% (P < 0.001),布制口罩使用率从78%下降到69% (P < 0.001)。不良事件的出现(校正RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95)和产生气溶胶的操作(校正RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.82)与依从性呈负相关,而接触发热呼吸道疾病患者与依从性呈正相关(校正RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.20)。使用医用口罩或布口罩(平均使用量≥工作时间的70%)与临床呼吸系统疾病、流感样疾病和实验室确认的病毒感染无关。结论了解影响依从性的因素对卫生工作者的职业健康安全具有重要意义。应制定新的战略和工具,以加强对卫生保健公约的遵守。出现不适和呼吸问题等不良事件可能是低依从性使用口罩的主要原因,应进行进一步研究以改善口罩的设计/材料,以改善佩戴者的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Response to Article by Prof. Hans Kromhout, Hygiene Without Numbers. The Validity and Applicability of Using a Generic Exposure Assessment Model for Occupational Exposure to Nano-Objects and Their Aggregates and Agglomerates. Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Polish Coke Plant Workers. A New Miniature Respirable Sampler for In-mask Sampling: Part 2-Tests Performed Inside the Mask. When Are Risk Analyses on Job Titles Informative?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1