Single Stock Futures Trading and Its Impact on Feedback Trading and Volatility: A Case Study of Pakistan

I. Malik, Attaullah Shah, S. Khan
{"title":"Single Stock Futures Trading and Its Impact on Feedback Trading and Volatility: A Case Study of Pakistan","authors":"I. Malik, Attaullah Shah, S. Khan","doi":"10.32368/FJES.20130905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we examine the possibility of an impact of the resumption of trading in Single Stock Futures (SSFs) on the dynamics (positive feedback trading and price volatility) of the underlying stocks in Pakistan’s market. Specifically, we test the hypothesis that trading in SSFs promotes or inhibits positive feedback trading in the spot market. Analyzing SSFs has several advantages over investigation of index futures. First, any impact of futures is more likely to be evident in the behavior of SSFs than index futures. Second, with SSFs it is possible to trade directly in the underlying stocks, and the endogeneity issue can be taken care of by using a relatively weighted portfolio of non-SSFs stocks. The findings of our study suggest that there is a statistically insignificant presence of positive feedback trading in both pre-SSFs period to post-SSFs period for both SSFs-listed stocks and a matching group of non-SSFs stocks. Furthermore, the unconditional volatility has significantly changed in both SSFs and non-SSFs, while asymmetry coefficient is statistically insignificant for SSFs but significant for non-SSFs. Overall our findings suggest that resumption of SSFs neither promotes nor inhibits feedback trading in the underlying spot market in Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":287077,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32368/FJES.20130905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the possibility of an impact of the resumption of trading in Single Stock Futures (SSFs) on the dynamics (positive feedback trading and price volatility) of the underlying stocks in Pakistan’s market. Specifically, we test the hypothesis that trading in SSFs promotes or inhibits positive feedback trading in the spot market. Analyzing SSFs has several advantages over investigation of index futures. First, any impact of futures is more likely to be evident in the behavior of SSFs than index futures. Second, with SSFs it is possible to trade directly in the underlying stocks, and the endogeneity issue can be taken care of by using a relatively weighted portfolio of non-SSFs stocks. The findings of our study suggest that there is a statistically insignificant presence of positive feedback trading in both pre-SSFs period to post-SSFs period for both SSFs-listed stocks and a matching group of non-SSFs stocks. Furthermore, the unconditional volatility has significantly changed in both SSFs and non-SSFs, while asymmetry coefficient is statistically insignificant for SSFs but significant for non-SSFs. Overall our findings suggest that resumption of SSFs neither promotes nor inhibits feedback trading in the underlying spot market in Pakistan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单一股票期货交易及其对反馈交易和波动率的影响——以巴基斯坦为例
在本文中,我们研究了单一股票期货(ssf)恢复交易对巴基斯坦市场基础股票动态(正反馈交易和价格波动)影响的可能性。具体来说,我们检验了ssf交易促进或抑制现货市场正反馈交易的假设。分析ssf与调查指数期货相比有几个优势。首先,期货的任何影响都可能比指数期货更明显地体现在社保基金的行为上。其次,有了社保基金,可以直接交易标的股票,内生性问题可以通过使用非社保基金股票的相对加权组合来解决。我们的研究结果表明,在ssfs前和ssfs后,ssfs上市股票和匹配组非ssfs股票的正反馈交易在统计上都不显著。此外,无条件波动率在SSFs和非SSFs中都发生了显著变化,而非SSFs的不对称系数在SSFs中不显著,而在非SSFs中显著。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,ssf的恢复既不促进也不抑制巴基斯坦基础现货市场的反馈交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managing China's Stock Markets: The Economics of the National Team The Emerging Asia Pacific Capital Markets: Bangladesh Is Illiquidity Priced in the Chinese Stock Market? Could Etfs Make Stock Markets More Vulnerable to Systemic Liquidity Shock? – Evidence From Emerging Asia Regimes, Non-Linearities, and Price Discontinuities in Indian Energy Stocks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1