Uncontested Proceedings on Federal Dockets in the Early Republic

James E. Pfander
{"title":"Uncontested Proceedings on Federal Dockets in the Early Republic","authors":"James E. Pfander","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197571408.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes the forms of uncontested adjudication that appeared on the dockets of the federal courts in the early Republic. Prominent among these examples was the practice of petitioning on an ex parte basis for a grant of naturalized citizenship under a law the First Congress adopted in 1790 to assign such work to the federal courts. Other examples include warrant proceedings, prize and salvage litigation in the federal admiralty courts, and veterans’ pension claims. Federal courts in the period agreed to entertain such proceedings as proper subjects of Article III adjudication and treated the resulting judgments as final and binding determinations of the right in question. There was no suggestion that the case-or-controversy language, or anything else in Article III, foreclosed such adjudications.","PeriodicalId":394146,"journal":{"name":"Cases Without Controversies","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cases Without Controversies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197571408.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter describes the forms of uncontested adjudication that appeared on the dockets of the federal courts in the early Republic. Prominent among these examples was the practice of petitioning on an ex parte basis for a grant of naturalized citizenship under a law the First Congress adopted in 1790 to assign such work to the federal courts. Other examples include warrant proceedings, prize and salvage litigation in the federal admiralty courts, and veterans’ pension claims. Federal courts in the period agreed to entertain such proceedings as proper subjects of Article III adjudication and treated the resulting judgments as final and binding determinations of the right in question. There was no suggestion that the case-or-controversy language, or anything else in Article III, foreclosed such adjudications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共和初期联邦诉讼中的无争议诉讼
本章描述了共和初期联邦法院案卷中出现的无争议裁决形式。在这些例子中,最突出的是根据1790年第一届国会通过的一项法律,在单方面的基础上请求给予入籍公民身份的做法,这项法律将这项工作分配给了联邦法院。其他的例子包括搜查令程序,联邦海事法庭的奖金和救助诉讼,以及退伍军人的养老金索赔。在这一期间,联邦法院同意将这种诉讼程序作为第三条裁决的适当对象,并将所产生的判决视为对有关权利的最终和有约束力的决定。没有任何迹象表明,第三条中“案件或争议”的措辞或其他任何内容取消了这种裁决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uncontested Adjudication and Standing to Sue The New Adverse-Party Rule Confronts Judicial Practice The Origins of Uncontested Adjudication Evaluating Defenses of a Requirement of Adverse Interests Uncontested Adjudication and the Modern Case-or-Controversy Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1