Features of Objective and Independent Nature of Expert Evidence: Prospective Joint Venture for Scientific and Legal Actors in Pakistan

Dr Aamir Abbas, Dr Atika Lohani
{"title":"Features of Objective and Independent Nature of Expert Evidence: Prospective Joint Venture for Scientific and Legal Actors in Pakistan","authors":"Dr Aamir Abbas, Dr Atika Lohani","doi":"10.52279/jlss.03.02.214227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The academic approach towards relevancy, reliability, validity and admissibility of scientific expert evidence, is important to the literature on scientific evidence. This article, however, underpins the fact that the reliability test of scientific expert evidence is baseline test and suggests the importance of admissibility test and the assessment of probative value on the objective standards of scientific expert evidence. Nevertheless, the test concerns with features of objective and independent nature of expert evidence. This is real challenge for adversarial systems and depends on how the systems deal with adversarial expert evidence. This article presents an overview of suggested models, established systems in USA, and UK, to secure the objective, impartial, and non-biased expert evidence. In doing so the article highlights the need to introduce code of duties, obligations, and responsibilities of expert witnesses in Pakistan, and the need for capacity building of legal actors in this regard.","PeriodicalId":292498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law & Social Studies","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law & Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.03.02.214227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The academic approach towards relevancy, reliability, validity and admissibility of scientific expert evidence, is important to the literature on scientific evidence. This article, however, underpins the fact that the reliability test of scientific expert evidence is baseline test and suggests the importance of admissibility test and the assessment of probative value on the objective standards of scientific expert evidence. Nevertheless, the test concerns with features of objective and independent nature of expert evidence. This is real challenge for adversarial systems and depends on how the systems deal with adversarial expert evidence. This article presents an overview of suggested models, established systems in USA, and UK, to secure the objective, impartial, and non-biased expert evidence. In doing so the article highlights the need to introduce code of duties, obligations, and responsibilities of expert witnesses in Pakistan, and the need for capacity building of legal actors in this regard.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家证据的客观性和独立性特征:巴基斯坦科学和法律行为者的前瞻性合作
对科学专家证据的相关性、可靠性、有效性和可采性的学术研究对于科学证据文献的研究是非常重要的。然而,本文强调了科学专家证据的信度检验是基线检验的事实,并提出了可采性检验和证据价值评估对科学专家证据客观标准的重要性。然而,该检验涉及到专家证据的客观性和独立性的特点。这是对抗性系统的真正挑战,取决于系统如何处理对抗性专家证据。本文概述了美国和英国建议的模型和建立的系统,以确保客观、公正和无偏见的专家证据。为此,该条强调了在巴基斯坦引入专家证人职责、义务和责任守则的必要性,以及在这方面加强法律行为体能力建设的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reorganizing Punjab on Administrative Lines: Potentials and Challenges Role of Wali in Contract Marriage of Islam: A Critical Analysis Legal Ethics and Privilege Communication Who can Practice Islamic Entrepreneurship: A Review of Recent Literature on Personality Traits An Analysis of Socio-Economic and Health Issues of Aged Construction Workers as Perceived by them
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1