Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Syariah BUMN dan Non BUMN dengan Metode RGEC

Hafiz Santak Taram, Isfandayani Isfandayani
{"title":"Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Syariah BUMN dan Non BUMN dengan Metode RGEC","authors":"Hafiz Santak Taram, Isfandayani Isfandayani","doi":"10.33558/attamwil.v1i2.5723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the comparison of the financial performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks and BUMN Non Islamic commercial banks on the variables of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital (RGEC) for the 2017-2020 period represented by the ratio of Non Performing Financing (NPF), Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Operating Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Return On Assets (ROA), Return On Equity (ROE), and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The results of this study show that of the 7 ratios analyzed, there are 5 ratios with significant differences between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks and Non BUMN Islamic commercial banks during the 2017-2020 period, namely FDR with a significance of 0.000, BOPO with a significance of 0.011 Good Corporate Governance with a significance of 0.011. 0.003 significance, ROA with 0.024 significance, and ROE with 0.020 significance. While the NPF ratio with a significance of 0.921, CAR with a significance of 0.744, and RGEC Composite Rating with a significance of 0.510 there is no significant difference between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks and non-BUMN Islamic commercial banks during the 2017-2020 period. The last analysis on the consolidated financial performance assessment of all RGEC variables shows that the performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks is not better than the performance of Non-BUMN Islamic commercial banks where the average composite value for 4 years is the performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks (80%).","PeriodicalId":165900,"journal":{"name":"At-Tamwil: Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"At-Tamwil: Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33558/attamwil.v1i2.5723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparison of the financial performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks and BUMN Non Islamic commercial banks on the variables of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital (RGEC) for the 2017-2020 period represented by the ratio of Non Performing Financing (NPF), Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Operating Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Return On Assets (ROA), Return On Equity (ROE), and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The results of this study show that of the 7 ratios analyzed, there are 5 ratios with significant differences between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks and Non BUMN Islamic commercial banks during the 2017-2020 period, namely FDR with a significance of 0.000, BOPO with a significance of 0.011 Good Corporate Governance with a significance of 0.011. 0.003 significance, ROA with 0.024 significance, and ROE with 0.020 significance. While the NPF ratio with a significance of 0.921, CAR with a significance of 0.744, and RGEC Composite Rating with a significance of 0.510 there is no significant difference between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks and non-BUMN Islamic commercial banks during the 2017-2020 period. The last analysis on the consolidated financial performance assessment of all RGEC variables shows that the performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks is not better than the performance of Non-BUMN Islamic commercial banks where the average composite value for 4 years is the performance of BUMN Islamic commercial banks (80%).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰国有企业和非国有银行一般财务业绩比较法的分析
本研究旨在分析BUMN伊斯兰商业银行和BUMN非伊斯兰商业银行在2017-2020年期间风险状况、良好公司治理、收益和资本(RGEC)变量上的财务绩效比较,这些变量由不良融资比率(NPF)、融资与存款比率(FDR)、营业费用与营业收入(BOPO)、良好公司治理(GCG)、资产收益率(ROA)、股本收益率(ROE)、资本充足率(CAR)。本研究结果表明,在分析的7个比率中,有5个比率在2017-2020年期间BUMN伊斯兰商业银行与非BUMN伊斯兰商业银行的财务绩效之间存在显著差异,即FDR的显著性为0.000,BOPO的显著性为0.011,Good Corporate Governance的显著性为0.011。0.003显著性,ROA显著性0.024,ROE显著性0.020。NPF比率显著性为0.921,CAR显著性为0.744,RGEC综合评级显著性为0.510,但2017-2020年期间,北方伊斯兰商业银行与非北方伊斯兰商业银行的财务绩效无显著差异。最后对所有RGEC变量的合并财务绩效评估进行分析,发现BUMN伊斯兰商业银行的绩效并不比Non-BUMN伊斯兰商业银行的绩效好,Non-BUMN伊斯兰商业银行4年的平均综合值为BUMN伊斯兰商业银行的绩效(80%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pengaruh Pendapatan, Kepercayaan, Dan Pengetahuan Terhadap Minat Membayar Zakat (Studi Pada Karyawan Di Kawasan Mega Kuningan) Qard Al Hasan: Instrumen Moneter Syariah Dalam Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Indonesia Implementasi Fatwa DSN MUI Terhadap Pembiayaan Sindikasi Melalui Akad Musyarakah Pada BPRS HIK Cibitung Strategi Pemasaran Produk SimPel iB Bank BTN Syariah Saat Pandemi Covid-19 Analisis Risiko Nilai Tukar Mata Uang Asing Dengan Menggunakan Metode Value at Risk (VAR) Pada Bank Muamalat Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1