Matrix Factorization in Social Group Recommender Systems

I. Christensen, S. Schiaffino
{"title":"Matrix Factorization in Social Group Recommender Systems","authors":"I. Christensen, S. Schiaffino","doi":"10.1109/MICAI.2013.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, Group Recommender Systems (GRS) apply an aggregation approach, which computes a group rating for each item by estimating unknown individual ratings, for which has been demonstrated that matrix factorization (MF) models are superior to classic nearest-neighbor techniques in individual recommender systems. Moreover, when people are in a group making a choice from alternatives, they tend to change their opinions accordingly to the social influence exerted by others' group members. Sociological analyses suggest that some social factors express social influence in a group, such as, cohesion, social similarity and social centrality. In this work, we combine a MF model to estimate unknown ratings with a social network analysis (SNA) to evidence possible social influence. Firstly, we present an analysis of the relevance of social factors detected in relation with the members' opinions and, then, we describe the results obtained when comparing the proposed technique with the classic group recommender technique.","PeriodicalId":340039,"journal":{"name":"2013 12th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 12th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MICAI.2013.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Traditionally, Group Recommender Systems (GRS) apply an aggregation approach, which computes a group rating for each item by estimating unknown individual ratings, for which has been demonstrated that matrix factorization (MF) models are superior to classic nearest-neighbor techniques in individual recommender systems. Moreover, when people are in a group making a choice from alternatives, they tend to change their opinions accordingly to the social influence exerted by others' group members. Sociological analyses suggest that some social factors express social influence in a group, such as, cohesion, social similarity and social centrality. In this work, we combine a MF model to estimate unknown ratings with a social network analysis (SNA) to evidence possible social influence. Firstly, we present an analysis of the relevance of social factors detected in relation with the members' opinions and, then, we describe the results obtained when comparing the proposed technique with the classic group recommender technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会群体推荐系统中的矩阵分解
传统的群体推荐系统(GRS)采用聚合方法,通过估计未知的个体评分来计算每个项目的群体评分,这已经证明矩阵分解(MF)模型在个体推荐系统中优于经典的最近邻技术。此外,当人们在一个群体中做出选择时,他们往往会根据其他群体成员施加的社会影响而改变自己的观点。社会学分析表明,一些社会因素表达了群体中的社会影响力,如凝聚力、社会相似性和社会中心性。在这项工作中,我们将MF模型与社会网络分析(SNA)相结合,以估计未知评级,以证明可能的社会影响。首先,我们分析了与成员意见相关的社会因素的相关性,然后,我们描述了将所提出的技术与经典的群体推荐技术进行比较时获得的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coordination Model for Multi-robot Systems Based on Cooperative Behaviors JasMo - A Modularization Framework for Jason Examining Everyday Speech and Motor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease for Diagnosis and Progression Tracking Quantifiers Types Resolution in NL Software Requirements An Uncertainty Quantification Method Based on Generalized Interval
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1