How Do Code Changes Evolve in Different Platforms? A Mining-Based Investigation

Markos Viggiato, Johnatan Oliveira, Eduardo Figueiredo, Pooyan Jamshidi, Christian Kästner
{"title":"How Do Code Changes Evolve in Different Platforms? A Mining-Based Investigation","authors":"Markos Viggiato, Johnatan Oliveira, Eduardo Figueiredo, Pooyan Jamshidi, Christian Kästner","doi":"10.1109/ICSME.2019.00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code changes are performed differently in the mobile and non-mobile platforms. Prior work has investigated the differences in specific platforms. However, we still lack a deeper understanding of how code changes evolve across different software platforms. In this paper, we present a study aiming at investigating the frequency of changes and how source code, build and test changes co-evolve in mobile and non-mobile platforms. We developed regression models to explain which factors influence the frequency of changes and applied the Apriori algorithm to find types of changes that frequently co-occur. Our findings show that non-mobile repositories have a higher number of commits per month and our regression models suggest that being mobile significantly impacts on the number of commits in a negative direction when controlling for confound factors, such as code size. We also found that developers do not usually change source code files together with build or test files. We argue that our results can provide valuable information for developers on how changes are performed in different platforms so that practices adopted in successful software systems can be followed.","PeriodicalId":106748,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2019.00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Code changes are performed differently in the mobile and non-mobile platforms. Prior work has investigated the differences in specific platforms. However, we still lack a deeper understanding of how code changes evolve across different software platforms. In this paper, we present a study aiming at investigating the frequency of changes and how source code, build and test changes co-evolve in mobile and non-mobile platforms. We developed regression models to explain which factors influence the frequency of changes and applied the Apriori algorithm to find types of changes that frequently co-occur. Our findings show that non-mobile repositories have a higher number of commits per month and our regression models suggest that being mobile significantly impacts on the number of commits in a negative direction when controlling for confound factors, such as code size. We also found that developers do not usually change source code files together with build or test files. We argue that our results can provide valuable information for developers on how changes are performed in different platforms so that practices adopted in successful software systems can be followed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同平台上的代码变化是如何演变的?基于采矿的调查
在移动和非移动平台上执行代码更改是不同的。先前的工作调查了特定平台的差异。然而,我们仍然缺乏对代码变化如何在不同软件平台上演变的更深入的理解。在本文中,我们提出了一项研究,旨在调查变化的频率,以及源代码、构建和测试变化如何在移动和非移动平台上共同发展。我们开发了回归模型来解释哪些因素影响变化的频率,并应用Apriori算法来发现经常同时发生的变化类型。我们的研究结果表明,非移动存储库每月的提交数量更高,我们的回归模型表明,在控制混杂因素(如代码大小)时,移动对提交数量的影响是负向的。我们还发现,开发人员通常不会将源代码文件与构建文件或测试文件一起更改。我们认为,我们的结果可以为开发人员提供有价值的信息,说明如何在不同的平台上执行更改,以便在成功的软件系统中采用可以遵循的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Same App, Different Countries: A Preliminary User Reviews Study on Most Downloaded iOS Apps Towards Better Understanding Developer Perception of Refactoring Decomposing God Classes at Siemens Self-Admitted Technical Debt Removal and Refactoring Actions: Co-Occurrence or More? A Validation Method of Self-Adaptive Strategy Based on POMDP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1