58 First-phase ejection fraction predicts repsonse to cardiac resynchronization therapy and adverse outcomes

H. Gu, B. Sidhu, L. Fang, J. Webb, Tom Jackson, S. Claridge, R. Razavi, P. Chowienczyk, A. Rinaldi
{"title":"58 First-phase ejection fraction predicts repsonse to cardiac resynchronization therapy and adverse outcomes","authors":"H. Gu, B. Sidhu, L. Fang, J. Webb, Tom Jackson, S. Claridge, R. Razavi, P. Chowienczyk, A. Rinaldi","doi":"10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is an important therapeutic treatment for chronic heart failure. However, even in carefully selected cases up to 40% of patient fail to respond. First-phase ejection fraction (EF1), the ejection fraction up to the time of maximal ventricular contraction, is a novel and more sensitive echocardiographic measure of early systolic function. We examined the value of EF1, to predict response to CRT and clinical outcomes after CRT. Methods Echocardiography was performed in 197 patients (table 1) who underwent CRT between 2009 and 2018 and were followed to determine clinical outcomes. LV volumes were measured by 2D Simpson’s method from apical views at end-diastole, time of peak aortic valve flow and end-systole to give end-diastolic volume (EDV), volume at TPAVF (V1) and ESV. 3D echocardiography was performed in a sub-sample of patients (n=73) allowing automated determination of EF1. EF1 was calculated as the percentage change between EDV and V1: EF 1= (EDV – V1) / EDV x 100 %. Results Volumetric response rate (reduction in end-systolic volume ≥ 15%) was 92.3% vs. 12.1%, for those with EF1 in the highest vs. lowest tertiles (p 85% sensitivity and specificity for prediction of response to CRT; on multivariate binary logistic regression analysis incorporating previously defined predictors (table 2) EF1 was the strongest predictor of response (odds ratio: 1.563, 95% confidence interval: 1.371-1.782, per 1% change in EF1, p Improvement in EF1 at 6 months (figure 1) after CRT implantation (6.5±5.8% vs 1.8±4.3% in responders vs. non-responders, p Conclusion EF1, a simple measure of early systolic function, is a promising predictor of response to CRT and may be useful in selecting patients for CRT and as a target for optimising CRT and other measures to improve outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Conflict of Interest None","PeriodicalId":193598,"journal":{"name":"Allied health professionals/Nursing/Health scientists","volume":"19 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allied health professionals/Nursing/Health scientists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is an important therapeutic treatment for chronic heart failure. However, even in carefully selected cases up to 40% of patient fail to respond. First-phase ejection fraction (EF1), the ejection fraction up to the time of maximal ventricular contraction, is a novel and more sensitive echocardiographic measure of early systolic function. We examined the value of EF1, to predict response to CRT and clinical outcomes after CRT. Methods Echocardiography was performed in 197 patients (table 1) who underwent CRT between 2009 and 2018 and were followed to determine clinical outcomes. LV volumes were measured by 2D Simpson’s method from apical views at end-diastole, time of peak aortic valve flow and end-systole to give end-diastolic volume (EDV), volume at TPAVF (V1) and ESV. 3D echocardiography was performed in a sub-sample of patients (n=73) allowing automated determination of EF1. EF1 was calculated as the percentage change between EDV and V1: EF 1= (EDV – V1) / EDV x 100 %. Results Volumetric response rate (reduction in end-systolic volume ≥ 15%) was 92.3% vs. 12.1%, for those with EF1 in the highest vs. lowest tertiles (p 85% sensitivity and specificity for prediction of response to CRT; on multivariate binary logistic regression analysis incorporating previously defined predictors (table 2) EF1 was the strongest predictor of response (odds ratio: 1.563, 95% confidence interval: 1.371-1.782, per 1% change in EF1, p Improvement in EF1 at 6 months (figure 1) after CRT implantation (6.5±5.8% vs 1.8±4.3% in responders vs. non-responders, p Conclusion EF1, a simple measure of early systolic function, is a promising predictor of response to CRT and may be useful in selecting patients for CRT and as a target for optimising CRT and other measures to improve outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Conflict of Interest None
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一期射血分数预测对心脏再同步化治疗的反应和不良结局
心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)是慢性心力衰竭的重要治疗方法。然而,即使在精心挑选的病例中,高达40%的患者没有反应。第一阶段射血分数(EF1),即心室最大收缩时的射血分数,是一种新的、更敏感的早期收缩功能超声心动图测量方法。我们检测了EF1的价值,以预测对CRT的反应和CRT后的临床结果。方法对2009年至2018年间接受CRT治疗的197例患者(表1)进行超声心动图检查,并随访临床结果。采用二维辛普森法从舒张末期根尖角度、主动脉瓣血流峰值时间和收缩期末测量左室容积,得出舒张末期容积(EDV)、TPAVF容积(V1)和ESV。在患者亚样本(n=73)中进行3D超声心动图检查,允许自动测定EF1。EF1以EDV与V1之间的变化百分比计算:EF1 = (EDV - V1) / EDV × 100%。结果EF1患者的容积缓解率(收缩末期容积减少≥15%)为92.3% vs. 12.1%(预测CRT反应的敏感性和特异性为85%;多变量二元逻辑回归分析结合先前定义的预测因子(表2),EF1是反应的最强预测因子(优势比:1.563,95%置信区间:EF1在CRT植入后6个月的改善(图1)(应答者和无应答者分别为6.5±5.8%和1.8±4.3%)。结论EF1是早期收缩功能的简单指标,是对CRT反应的一个有希望的预测指标,可能有助于选择接受CRT的患者,并作为优化CRT和其他改善HFrEF患者预后的措施的目标。利益冲突无
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
79 The atrial fibrillation virtual ward – the role of the advanced care practitioner 78 Implantable loop recorders: a cardiac physiologist led explant service 76 The impact of a novel advanced clinical practitioner (ACP) - physician hybrid clinic model on specialist cardiology outpatient clinic services within a busy tertiary cardiac centre and how it compares to the traditional physician-led model 80 Implementation and evaluation of a shared decision meeting protocol in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) 75 Experience and outcome from a london NHS trust heart failure virtual ward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1