{"title":"The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): Its legacy for type 2 diabetes management","authors":"I. Campbell","doi":"10.3132/PCCJ.2009.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"subjects (> 120% ideal body weight) randomised primarily to metformin, there was a substantial risk reduction for MI (39%, p=0.01) and all-cause mortality (36%, p=0.011). The blood pressure control part of the UKPDS, known as the Hypertension in Diabetes Study (HDS), demonstrated that tight blood pressure control over nine years (mean fall of 160/94 to 144/82 mmHg), with either atenolol or captopril, compared to a less tight blood pressure control group (mean fall of 161/94 to 154/87 mmHg) – a difference of 10/5 mmHg, sustained over the nine years – resulted in significant benefit. There was a reduction in overall risk of microvascular complications by 37% (p=0.0092), diabetes-related deaths by 32% (p=0.0046) but no significant effect was seen in all-cause mortality. After 6 years, 29% of the diabetic subjects required three or more drugs to achieve tight blood pressure control.","PeriodicalId":308856,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Cardiovascular Journal (pccj)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Cardiovascular Journal (pccj)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3132/PCCJ.2009.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
subjects (> 120% ideal body weight) randomised primarily to metformin, there was a substantial risk reduction for MI (39%, p=0.01) and all-cause mortality (36%, p=0.011). The blood pressure control part of the UKPDS, known as the Hypertension in Diabetes Study (HDS), demonstrated that tight blood pressure control over nine years (mean fall of 160/94 to 144/82 mmHg), with either atenolol or captopril, compared to a less tight blood pressure control group (mean fall of 161/94 to 154/87 mmHg) – a difference of 10/5 mmHg, sustained over the nine years – resulted in significant benefit. There was a reduction in overall risk of microvascular complications by 37% (p=0.0092), diabetes-related deaths by 32% (p=0.0046) but no significant effect was seen in all-cause mortality. After 6 years, 29% of the diabetic subjects required three or more drugs to achieve tight blood pressure control.