European experience in hearing and resolving electoral disputes in administrative justice

Olha Skochylias-Pavliv
{"title":"European experience in hearing and resolving electoral disputes in administrative justice","authors":"Olha Skochylias-Pavliv","doi":"10.23939/law2023.37.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research is devoted to the study of the European experience of hearing and resolving electoral disputes in the administrative justice system. The availability of a national system of effective consideration of disputes concerning legal relations related to the election or referendum process is one of the basic guarantees of free and fair elections. Ukraine is a state that is integrating into the European legal space, thus the European system of standards is of key importance. It is pointed out that the electoral law of most European countries provides for two ways of hearing electoral disputes: administrative and judicial. The administrative method of electoral dispute resolution provides for the possibility of itsconsideration by various bodies, depending on the elections concerning which dispute arises (parliamentary, provincial, municipal). The judicial procedure for consideration of electoral disputes in foreign countries also has a number of peculiarities. The author describes the experience of such countries as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Germany, and France. The advantages and disadvantages of administrative and judicial methods of electoral dispute resolution in European countries are analyzed. It is pointed out that despite the positions according to which preference is given to election commissions consisting of highly qualified specialists, the current state of affairs in Ukraine does not allow to remove election disputes from the jurisdiction of administrative courts. This requires that election commissions be composed of independent, impartial, professional members, and the practice of conducting elections in Ukraine shows quite opposite situation. Nevertheless, in general, the procedural legislation of Ukraine regulating the procedure and terms for appealing electoral violations and consideration of cases of this category by administrative courts in most aspects complies with established European standards.","PeriodicalId":421282,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.37.188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research is devoted to the study of the European experience of hearing and resolving electoral disputes in the administrative justice system. The availability of a national system of effective consideration of disputes concerning legal relations related to the election or referendum process is one of the basic guarantees of free and fair elections. Ukraine is a state that is integrating into the European legal space, thus the European system of standards is of key importance. It is pointed out that the electoral law of most European countries provides for two ways of hearing electoral disputes: administrative and judicial. The administrative method of electoral dispute resolution provides for the possibility of itsconsideration by various bodies, depending on the elections concerning which dispute arises (parliamentary, provincial, municipal). The judicial procedure for consideration of electoral disputes in foreign countries also has a number of peculiarities. The author describes the experience of such countries as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Germany, and France. The advantages and disadvantages of administrative and judicial methods of electoral dispute resolution in European countries are analyzed. It is pointed out that despite the positions according to which preference is given to election commissions consisting of highly qualified specialists, the current state of affairs in Ukraine does not allow to remove election disputes from the jurisdiction of administrative courts. This requires that election commissions be composed of independent, impartial, professional members, and the practice of conducting elections in Ukraine shows quite opposite situation. Nevertheless, in general, the procedural legislation of Ukraine regulating the procedure and terms for appealing electoral violations and consideration of cases of this category by administrative courts in most aspects complies with established European standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲在行政司法中审理和解决选举纠纷的经验
这项研究致力于研究欧洲在行政司法系统中审理和解决选举争端的经验。有一个有效审议与选举或全民投票进程有关的法律关系争端的国家制度是自由和公正选举的基本保障之一。乌克兰是一个正在融入欧洲法律空间的国家,因此欧洲标准体系至关重要。文章指出,大多数欧洲国家的选举法规定了行政和司法两种审理选举纠纷的方式。选举争议解决的行政方法提供了由不同机构审议的可能性,这取决于产生争议的选举(议会、省、市)。外国审理选举争端的司法程序也有一些特点。作者描述了瑞典、挪威、丹麦、芬兰、德国、法国等国家的经验。分析了欧洲国家选举纠纷行政解决和司法解决的优缺点。有人指出,尽管有优先考虑由高素质专家组成的选举委员会的立场,但乌克兰目前的事态不允许将选举争端从行政法院的管辖范围中排除。这要求选举委员会由独立、公正和专业的成员组成,而在乌克兰举行选举的做法显示出完全相反的情况。然而,总的来说,乌克兰的程序法规定了对违反选举的行为提出上诉的程序和条件以及行政法院对这类案件的审理在大多数方面符合既定的欧洲标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Canonical pedagogy in metaphysical law Peculiarities of the introduction of the joint transit procedure in Ukraine Cyber security of the banking sector of Ukraine: concepts, problems and experience of foreign countries Measures to ensure the institutional independence of the judiciary The role of higher government bodies in European integration processes of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1