New Lower Bounds for Vertex Cover in the Lovasz-Schrijver Hierarchy

Iannis Tourlakis
{"title":"New Lower Bounds for Vertex Cover in the Lovasz-Schrijver Hierarchy","authors":"Iannis Tourlakis","doi":"10.1109/CCC.2006.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lovdsz and Schrijver (1991) defined three progressively stronger procedures LS0, LS and LS+, for systematically tightening linear relaxations over many rounds. All three procedures yield the integral hull after at most n rounds. On the other hand, constant rounds of LS+ can derive the relaxations behind many famous approximation algorithms such as those for MAX-CUT, SPARSEST-CUT. So proving round lower bounds for these procedures on specific problems may give evidence about inapproximability. We prove new round lower bounds for vertex cover in the LS hierarchy. Arora et al. (2006) showed that the integrality gap for VERTEX COVER relaxations remains 2 - o(1) even after Omega(log n) rounds LS. However, their method can only prove round lower bounds as large as the girth of the input graph, which is O(log n) for interesting graphs. We break through this \"girth barrier\" and show that the integrality gap for VERTEX COVER remains 1.5 - epsi even after Omega(log2 n) rounds of LS. In contrast, the best PCP-based results only rule out 1.36-approximations. Moreover, we conjecture that the new technique we introduce to prove our lower bound, the \"fence\" method, may lead to linear or nearly linear LS round lower bounds for VERTEX COVER","PeriodicalId":325664,"journal":{"name":"21st Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'06)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2006.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Lovdsz and Schrijver (1991) defined three progressively stronger procedures LS0, LS and LS+, for systematically tightening linear relaxations over many rounds. All three procedures yield the integral hull after at most n rounds. On the other hand, constant rounds of LS+ can derive the relaxations behind many famous approximation algorithms such as those for MAX-CUT, SPARSEST-CUT. So proving round lower bounds for these procedures on specific problems may give evidence about inapproximability. We prove new round lower bounds for vertex cover in the LS hierarchy. Arora et al. (2006) showed that the integrality gap for VERTEX COVER relaxations remains 2 - o(1) even after Omega(log n) rounds LS. However, their method can only prove round lower bounds as large as the girth of the input graph, which is O(log n) for interesting graphs. We break through this "girth barrier" and show that the integrality gap for VERTEX COVER remains 1.5 - epsi even after Omega(log2 n) rounds of LS. In contrast, the best PCP-based results only rule out 1.36-approximations. Moreover, we conjecture that the new technique we introduce to prove our lower bound, the "fence" method, may lead to linear or nearly linear LS round lower bounds for VERTEX COVER
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lovasz-Schrijver层次中顶点覆盖的新下界
Lovdsz和Schrijver(1991)定义了三个渐进式更强的过程LS0, LS和LS+,用于系统地收紧多个回合的线性松弛。所有三个程序最多在n轮后产生完整的船体。另一方面,常数轮LS+可以推导出许多著名的近似算法背后的松弛,例如MAX-CUT, SPARSEST-CUT。因此,在具体问题上证明这些过程的下界可以为不逼近性提供证据。我们证明了LS层次结构中顶点覆盖的新的轮下界。Arora et al.(2006)表明,即使在(log n) round LS之后,VERTEX COVER松弛的完整性间隙仍然是2 - 0(1)。然而,他们的方法只能证明与输入图周长一样大的整数下界,对于有趣的图,这是O(log n)。我们突破了这个“周长障碍”,并证明了即使经过Omega(log2 n)轮LS, VERTEX COVER的完整性缺口仍然是1.5 - epsi。相比之下,基于pcp的最佳结果只排除了1.36近似值。此外,我们推测,我们引入的证明下界的新技术“栅栏”方法可能会导致VERTEX COVER的线性或近线性LS圆下界
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applications of the sum-product theorem in finite fields Hardness of the covering radius problem on lattices On modular counting with polynomials A generic time hierarchy for semantic models with one bit of advice Derandomization of probabilistic auxiliary pushdown automata classes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1