PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DENGAN METODE PROBING PROMPTING DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA

Intan Rambu Hidda, Chandra Sundaygara
{"title":"PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DENGAN METODE PROBING PROMPTING DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA","authors":"Intan Rambu Hidda, Chandra Sundaygara","doi":"10.21067/jtst.v3i3.6156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to (1) determine the difference in learning achievement between students who learn using discovery learning model with probing promting method and students who learn using discovery learning model; (2)) knowing the differences in student achievement for high and low motivation in the experimental class and the control class based on the learning model used; (3) to determine the interaction between discovery learning models and the probing prompting method with motivation on student achievement in SMP Negeri 6 Singosari in the 2019/2020 school year. This type of research is a quasi-experimental design with a posttest only control design group. The population in this study were all students of class VII and the research sample consisted of 25 class VII A as the experimental class and 22 students of class VII C as the control class. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The data were collected from the questionnaire on learning motivation and student achievement tests and then analyzed using the variant test (ANOVA).     \n             \nThe results showed that: (1) There is a difference in student achievement between students who learn using discovery learning models with probing prompting and students who learn using discovery learning models with a value of Fcount = 19.101 ≥ Ftable = 0.361 at a significant level of 0.000 <0.05 ( 2). The student's physics learning achievement value in the experimental class was higher than the control class. Therefore, the level of self-motivation is higher for the experimental class than the control class. (3) There is an influence of the interaction between discovery learning models with probing prompting and student learning motivation on student achievement with a value of Fcount = 1.013 ≥ Ftable = 0.361 at a significant level of 0.318 <0.05. The conclusion of this research is that physics learning using discovery learning model with probing prompting method has a positive effect on student learning motivation and student achievement, but the learning model and student learning motivation have a separate effect on student achievement. \n  \n  \nKeywords: Discovery Learning, Probing Prompting, Learning Motivation, Achievement Study \n  \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":170562,"journal":{"name":"Rainstek Jurnal Terapan Sains dan Teknologi","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rainstek Jurnal Terapan Sains dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21067/jtst.v3i3.6156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to (1) determine the difference in learning achievement between students who learn using discovery learning model with probing promting method and students who learn using discovery learning model; (2)) knowing the differences in student achievement for high and low motivation in the experimental class and the control class based on the learning model used; (3) to determine the interaction between discovery learning models and the probing prompting method with motivation on student achievement in SMP Negeri 6 Singosari in the 2019/2020 school year. This type of research is a quasi-experimental design with a posttest only control design group. The population in this study were all students of class VII and the research sample consisted of 25 class VII A as the experimental class and 22 students of class VII C as the control class. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The data were collected from the questionnaire on learning motivation and student achievement tests and then analyzed using the variant test (ANOVA).                  The results showed that: (1) There is a difference in student achievement between students who learn using discovery learning models with probing prompting and students who learn using discovery learning models with a value of Fcount = 19.101 ≥ Ftable = 0.361 at a significant level of 0.000 <0.05 ( 2). The student's physics learning achievement value in the experimental class was higher than the control class. Therefore, the level of self-motivation is higher for the experimental class than the control class. (3) There is an influence of the interaction between discovery learning models with probing prompting and student learning motivation on student achievement with a value of Fcount = 1.013 ≥ Ftable = 0.361 at a significant level of 0.318 <0.05. The conclusion of this research is that physics learning using discovery learning model with probing prompting method has a positive effect on student learning motivation and student achievement, but the learning model and student learning motivation have a separate effect on student achievement.     Keywords: Discovery Learning, Probing Prompting, Learning Motivation, Achievement Study      
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索学习模式与探测探寻方法的影响是学生学习动机对学生学习成就的反映
本研究旨在(1)确定采用探究性促进法学习的发现学习模式与采用发现学习模式学习的学生在学习成绩上的差异;(2)根据所采用的学习模式,了解实验班与对照班高、低动机学生成绩的差异;;(3)确定发现学习模式与带动机的探究性提示法对2019/2020学年新加坡中学学生成绩的交互作用。这类研究是一种准实验设计,只有后测对照组。本研究的总体为七班学生,研究样本为七A班25名,七C班22名,为对照组。使用的抽样技术是有目的的抽样。采用学习动机问卷和学生成绩测试问卷收集数据,采用变异检验(ANOVA)进行分析。结果表明:(1)使用探索性提示的发现学习模式学习的学生与使用发现学习模式学习的学生在学习成绩上存在差异(Fcount = 19.101≥Ftable = 0.361,显著性水平为0.000 <0.05)。(2)实验班学生的物理学习成就值高于对照班。因此,实验班的自我激励水平高于对照组。(3)探索性提示的发现学习模式与学生学习动机的交互作用对学生成绩有影响,Fcount = 1.013≥Ftable = 0.361,显著水平为0.318 <0.05。本研究的结论是:使用探索性提示方法的发现学习模式对学生的学习动机和成绩有积极的影响,但学习模式和学生的学习动机对学生的成绩有单独的影响。关键词:发现学习、探究式提示、学习动机、成就学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perancangan Sistem Informasi Buku Penghubung Menggunakan Model User Centered Design (UCD) Berbasis Web Efektifitas Pembelajaran Daring Di Mts Swasta Proyek Kandepag Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning dan Kerjasama Siswa Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Pengembangan Lkpd Elektronik Menggunakan Aplikasi Live Worksheet Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Pada Siswa Kelas Viii Smpn 17 Malang Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Prestasi Belajar IPA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1