The Law of Arbitration and EU Law – like Oil and Water?

Morten Broberg, N. Fenger
{"title":"The Law of Arbitration and EU Law – like Oil and Water?","authors":"Morten Broberg, N. Fenger","doi":"10.1163/24689017_0701006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between EU law and the law of arbitration has often been described as one of mutual indifference. However, from about 2010, the two systems began to interact with one-another through certain decisions of the CJEU. This led some observers to argue that the two systems had become intertwined. In order to establish whether the decisions of the CJEU provide a basis for such a finding, the present article considers the interaction between the two legal systems in three different areas. Firstly, whether in certain situations an arbitral tribunal must take EU law into consideration when deciding a dispute. Secondly, those situations where, one way or another, a Member State has been involved in the arbitration. Thirdly, the question whether arbitral tribunals can make so-called preliminary references to the CJEU under the TFEU. While the examination of the relationship between EU law and the law of arbitration shows that increasingly the two systems interact with each other, it also shows that in relative terms there are only a limited number of instances where EU law plays a role within the field of private arbitration. The article therefore concludes that the law of arbitration and EU law continue to be distinct legal systems.","PeriodicalId":164842,"journal":{"name":"European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24689017_0701006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between EU law and the law of arbitration has often been described as one of mutual indifference. However, from about 2010, the two systems began to interact with one-another through certain decisions of the CJEU. This led some observers to argue that the two systems had become intertwined. In order to establish whether the decisions of the CJEU provide a basis for such a finding, the present article considers the interaction between the two legal systems in three different areas. Firstly, whether in certain situations an arbitral tribunal must take EU law into consideration when deciding a dispute. Secondly, those situations where, one way or another, a Member State has been involved in the arbitration. Thirdly, the question whether arbitral tribunals can make so-called preliminary references to the CJEU under the TFEU. While the examination of the relationship between EU law and the law of arbitration shows that increasingly the two systems interact with each other, it also shows that in relative terms there are only a limited number of instances where EU law plays a role within the field of private arbitration. The article therefore concludes that the law of arbitration and EU law continue to be distinct legal systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仲裁法和欧盟法——像石油和水?
欧盟法和仲裁法之间的关系经常被描述为一种相互冷漠的关系。然而,大约从2010年开始,这两个体系开始通过欧洲法院的某些决定相互影响。这导致一些观察人士认为,这两种制度已经交织在一起。为了确定欧洲法院的决定是否为这一结论提供了依据,本文考虑了两个法律制度在三个不同领域的相互作用。首先,在某些情况下,仲裁庭在裁决争端时是否必须考虑欧盟法律。第二,一个会员国以这样或那样的方式参与仲裁的情况。第三,仲裁庭是否可以根据TFEU向欧洲法院提出所谓的初步参考。虽然对欧盟法和仲裁法之间关系的研究表明,这两种制度之间的相互影响越来越大,但它也表明,相对而言,欧盟法在私人仲裁领域发挥作用的案例数量有限。因此,本文得出结论,仲裁法和欧盟法仍然是不同的法律体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy Charter Treaty and the Paris Agreement – Friends or Foes? – 7th EFILA Lecture (28 October 2021) The European Union’s Proposed Amendments to Article 10(1) of the ECT: Advancing or Undermining Its Ambitions for the Green Transition? Going Out of Business: Representing Insolvent Claimants Seeking Investment Treaty Protection in Arbitrations Brought against States (Winner of the Essay Competition 2022) Green Power K/S and SCE Solar Don Benito APS v Kingdom of Spain: How EU Law Allegedly Trumps International Investment Law Does the cjeu Misunderstand Investment Treaty Arbitration in Commission v Micula?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1