No-Haggle Agreements

Saul Levmore, A. Porat
{"title":"No-Haggle Agreements","authors":"Saul Levmore, A. Porat","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2573902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some buyers might prefer not to haggle either because they recognize that the seller they face is likely to be a superior bargainer or because it is easier to comparison shop when prices are known and do not require an investment in transaction costs. Sellers, in turn, might appeal to these buyers by promising a no-haggle environment. In some settings, sellers can go further by promising individual buyers that they will not haggle. These buyers might then engage in one round of haggling, stating a price which the seller agrees to accept or reject, with no further possibility of negotiation. Such buyers might be more confident of getting better offers from agreeable sellers. We describe why and when such a process might be attractive, and suggest a legal remedy that makes it possible. This no-haggle process might be attractive to some repeat sellers when dealing with occasional buyers, and might often be attractive to one-time sellers and buyers, as in the case of many real estate negotiations.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2573902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Some buyers might prefer not to haggle either because they recognize that the seller they face is likely to be a superior bargainer or because it is easier to comparison shop when prices are known and do not require an investment in transaction costs. Sellers, in turn, might appeal to these buyers by promising a no-haggle environment. In some settings, sellers can go further by promising individual buyers that they will not haggle. These buyers might then engage in one round of haggling, stating a price which the seller agrees to accept or reject, with no further possibility of negotiation. Such buyers might be more confident of getting better offers from agreeable sellers. We describe why and when such a process might be attractive, and suggest a legal remedy that makes it possible. This no-haggle process might be attractive to some repeat sellers when dealing with occasional buyers, and might often be attractive to one-time sellers and buyers, as in the case of many real estate negotiations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No-Haggle协议
一些买家可能不愿意讨价还价,要么是因为他们认识到他们面对的卖家可能是一个优秀的议价者,要么是因为当价格已知时,比较购物更容易,不需要在交易成本上投资。反过来,卖家可能会通过承诺不讨价还价的环境来吸引这些买家。在某些情况下,卖家可以更进一步,向个人买家承诺他们不会讨价还价。然后,这些买家可能会进行一轮讨价还价,提出一个卖家同意接受或拒绝的价格,没有进一步谈判的可能性。这样的买家可能更有信心从满意的卖家那里得到更好的报价。我们描述了为什么和什么时候这样的过程可能是有吸引力的,并提出了使其成为可能的法律补救措施。这种不讨价还价的过程可能会吸引一些回头客,当与偶尔的买家打交道时,也可能经常吸引一次性的卖家和买家,就像许多房地产谈判的情况一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La garantía legal del Estatuto del Consumidor como mecanismo para proteger al comprador frente a vicios inmobiliarios progresivos (The Legal Guarantee of the Consumers Statute as a Mechanism to Protect Buyer Front of Progressive Real Estate Vices) Solidarismo y contratos relacionales: alternativas frente a la pandemia de covid-19 (Contractual Solidarism and Relational Contract Theory: Alternative Approaches to Contract Law in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic) Error Correction Mechanisms for Transactional Script Smart Contracts The Shadows of Litigation Finance Malas leyes (Bad Law)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1