Above and Beyond the Call of Duty: Enhanced Tax Obligations of the Public Employee

Kenneth H. Ryesky
{"title":"Above and Beyond the Call of Duty: Enhanced Tax Obligations of the Public Employee","authors":"Kenneth H. Ryesky","doi":"10.2190/GQJK-5P4M-QRPW-5Y3X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like other members of the public, those employed by the federal and state governments have personal tax filing and payment obligations. Government agencies seem to hold public employees and officers to enhanced standards in the discharge of their personal tax obligations. The degree and extent to which the tax obligations are so enhanced is dependent on several factors, including the government agency to which the employee reports, the employee's duties, the employee's rank within the agency, and other circumstances relevant to the employee in question. Tax collection agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service generally impose the most stringent tax compliance stand­ ards on their employees. The enhanced tax obligations must be viewed in light of the employees' personal rights. As the tax law grows increasingly complex, the tax obligations of public employees can be expected to be called to question with increasing frequency, raising concerns for public employer and employee alike. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) clearly and unequivocally requires individuals whose income exceeds a relatively low threshold to file their federal income tax returns in a timely manner [1, 2]. Failure to do so can lead to significant conse­ quences, both civil [3] and criminal [e.g., 4-5]. Most states have analogous requirements [e.g., 6-8]. The American system of income taxation is based on self-assessment in the initial filing of the return and calculation of the tax [9]. Such a system can operate only through the enforcement of \"strict filing standards\" [10]. Truthfulness on the part of the taxpayer is most imperative [11-13].","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/GQJK-5P4M-QRPW-5Y3X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like other members of the public, those employed by the federal and state governments have personal tax filing and payment obligations. Government agencies seem to hold public employees and officers to enhanced standards in the discharge of their personal tax obligations. The degree and extent to which the tax obligations are so enhanced is dependent on several factors, including the government agency to which the employee reports, the employee's duties, the employee's rank within the agency, and other circumstances relevant to the employee in question. Tax collection agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service generally impose the most stringent tax compliance stand­ ards on their employees. The enhanced tax obligations must be viewed in light of the employees' personal rights. As the tax law grows increasingly complex, the tax obligations of public employees can be expected to be called to question with increasing frequency, raising concerns for public employer and employee alike. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) clearly and unequivocally requires individuals whose income exceeds a relatively low threshold to file their federal income tax returns in a timely manner [1, 2]. Failure to do so can lead to significant conse­ quences, both civil [3] and criminal [e.g., 4-5]. Most states have analogous requirements [e.g., 6-8]. The American system of income taxation is based on self-assessment in the initial filing of the return and calculation of the tax [9]. Such a system can operate only through the enforcement of "strict filing standards" [10]. Truthfulness on the part of the taxpayer is most imperative [11-13].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越职责的召唤:加强公务员的纳税义务
与其他公众成员一样,那些受雇于联邦和州政府的人也有个人纳税申报和纳税义务。政府机关似乎要求公务员和官员在履行个人纳税义务方面提高标准。纳税义务增加的程度和程度取决于几个因素,包括雇员向其报告的政府机构、雇员的职责、雇员在该机构中的级别以及与该雇员有关的其他情况。像美国国税局(Internal Revenue Service)这样的税收征收机构通常对其雇员实行最严格的税务合规标准。加强纳税义务必须从雇员个人权利的角度来看待。随着税法的日益复杂,公务员的纳税义务可能会受到越来越多的质疑,这引起了公共雇主和雇员的担忧。《国内税收法》(IRC)明确明确地要求收入超过相对较低门槛的个人及时提交联邦所得税申报表[1,2]。如果不这样做,可能会导致严重的后果,包括民事后果和刑事后果[例4-5]。大多数州都有类似的要求[例如,6-8]。美国的所得税制度是建立在初次申报和计算所得税时的自我评估基础上的。这样的制度只有通过执行“严格的备案标准”才能运作。纳税人的诚实是最重要的[11-13]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Land Mines of the Family and Medical Leave Act Dress and Grooming Standards: How Legal are They? EQUAL PAY ACT CASES IN HIGHER EDUCATION Disparate Impact Discrimination and the ADEA: Coming of Age Disciplining Employees for Free Speech, Whistle Blowing, and Political Activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1