Development of a framework for UX KPIs in Industry - a case study: ABSTRACT

Tina Øvad, Kashmiri Stec, L. B. Larsen, Lucca Julie Nellemann, Jedrzej Czapla
{"title":"Development of a framework for UX KPIs in Industry - a case study: ABSTRACT","authors":"Tina Øvad, Kashmiri Stec, L. B. Larsen, Lucca Julie Nellemann, Jedrzej Czapla","doi":"10.1145/3441000.3441042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work addresses the needs companies face when assessing and tracking the UX quality of their products, which is necessary to ensure that the desired level of quality is met, clarify potential areas of improvement, and compare competitor products via benchmarking. We present a framework for UX KPI assessment at Bang & Olufsen, a luxury audio product manufacturer. The framework is inspired by well-known UX scales such as the UEQ and AttrakDiff as well as more business-oriented measures such as NPS and CES scores. The resulting UX KPI framework comprises the test procedures and a scale containing these and ten unique features such as \"Enjoyable”, “Exciting”, “Sound experience\". The paper presents and discusses the UX KPI framework and the rationales behind it. Results of more than 200 user tests are presented and discussed. Factor analysis has been employed to analyse the assumptions behind the UX KPI and identify where improvements can be made.","PeriodicalId":265398,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work addresses the needs companies face when assessing and tracking the UX quality of their products, which is necessary to ensure that the desired level of quality is met, clarify potential areas of improvement, and compare competitor products via benchmarking. We present a framework for UX KPI assessment at Bang & Olufsen, a luxury audio product manufacturer. The framework is inspired by well-known UX scales such as the UEQ and AttrakDiff as well as more business-oriented measures such as NPS and CES scores. The resulting UX KPI framework comprises the test procedures and a scale containing these and ten unique features such as "Enjoyable”, “Exciting”, “Sound experience". The paper presents and discusses the UX KPI framework and the rationales behind it. Results of more than 200 user tests are presented and discussed. Factor analysis has been employed to analyse the assumptions behind the UX KPI and identify where improvements can be made.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业用户体验关键绩效指标框架的开发——一个案例研究:ABSTRACT
这项工作解决了公司在评估和跟踪其产品的用户体验质量时所面临的需求,这对于确保达到期望的质量水平,明确潜在的改进领域,并通过基准比较竞争对手的产品是必要的。我们在奢侈音响产品制造商Bang & Olufsen提出了一个用户体验KPI评估框架。该框架的灵感来自于著名的用户体验量表,如UEQ和AttrakDiff,以及更多面向业务的措施,如NPS和CES分数。由此产生的用户体验关键绩效指标框架包括测试程序和包含这些和十个独特功能的量表,如“令人愉快”、“令人兴奋”、“声音体验”。本文介绍并讨论了用户体验KPI框架及其背后的原理。给出并讨论了200多个用户测试的结果。因子分析用于分析用户体验KPI背后的假设,并确定可以在哪些方面进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporal Impact on Cognitive Distraction Detection for Car Drivers using EEG A Tangible Multi-Display Toolkit to Support the Collaborative Design Exploration of AV-Pedestrian Interfaces Occupational Therapy Meets Design: An Augmented Reality Tool for Assistive Home Modifications Investigating Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Use Habits and Contexts: Habits, Locations, and Situations Are paired or single stimuli better to recognize genuine and posed smiles from observers’ galvanic skin response?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1