A Comparison of Numerical Techniques used for PV Module Model Parameter Extraction

A. Leedy, Muhammad Abdelraziq, Kristen Booth
{"title":"A Comparison of Numerical Techniques used for PV Module Model Parameter Extraction","authors":"A. Leedy, Muhammad Abdelraziq, Kristen Booth","doi":"10.1109/IGESSC55810.2022.9955323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a step-by-step solution procedure used to estimate the single-diode model parameters is proposed. The procedure is a combination of least-squares, Newtonian, and quasi- Newtonian numerical methods. Current and voltage measurements are acquired from a conventional 36-cell photovoltaic (PV) module manufactured by AMERESCO Solar. The single-diode equation was then fit to the acquired data in the least-squares sense. The developed least-squares equation is solved by two different numerical methods, the Newton-Raphson (NR) method, and Broyden’s method. Since there are five different parameters to be determined, a system of five nonlinear equations was developed and solved. The main distinction between the NR and Broyden’s algorithms is the way they handle the Jacobian matrix. The NR algorithm requires the computation of a new Jacobian matrix at every iteration. Broyden’s algorithm only requires an initial Jacobian, and then the Jacobian is updated iteratively by means of a correction formula. The functionality of the two algorithms is compared, and the five parameters extracted from each algorithm are used to simulate a 36-cell PV module. The simulation results are compared to experimental data to provide validation and to determine how accurate each procedure was in estimating the model parameters.","PeriodicalId":166147,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Green Energy and Smart System Systems(IGESSC)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Green Energy and Smart System Systems(IGESSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IGESSC55810.2022.9955323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, a step-by-step solution procedure used to estimate the single-diode model parameters is proposed. The procedure is a combination of least-squares, Newtonian, and quasi- Newtonian numerical methods. Current and voltage measurements are acquired from a conventional 36-cell photovoltaic (PV) module manufactured by AMERESCO Solar. The single-diode equation was then fit to the acquired data in the least-squares sense. The developed least-squares equation is solved by two different numerical methods, the Newton-Raphson (NR) method, and Broyden’s method. Since there are five different parameters to be determined, a system of five nonlinear equations was developed and solved. The main distinction between the NR and Broyden’s algorithms is the way they handle the Jacobian matrix. The NR algorithm requires the computation of a new Jacobian matrix at every iteration. Broyden’s algorithm only requires an initial Jacobian, and then the Jacobian is updated iteratively by means of a correction formula. The functionality of the two algorithms is compared, and the five parameters extracted from each algorithm are used to simulate a 36-cell PV module. The simulation results are compared to experimental data to provide validation and to determine how accurate each procedure was in estimating the model parameters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光伏组件模型参数提取的数值技术比较
本文提出了一种用于估计单二极管模型参数的分步求解方法。该程序是最小二乘,牛顿和准牛顿数值方法的组合。电流和电压测量是通过AMERESCO太阳能公司生产的传统36电池光伏(PV)模块获得的。然后用最小二乘法拟合所得数据的单二极管方程。采用Newton-Raphson (NR)法和Broyden法两种不同的数值方法求解了所建立的最小二乘方程。由于需要确定五个不同的参数,因此建立并求解了一个由五个非线性方程组成的系统。NR算法和Broyden算法的主要区别在于它们处理雅可比矩阵的方式。NR算法需要在每次迭代中计算一个新的雅可比矩阵。Broyden算法只需要初始雅可比矩阵,然后通过修正公式迭代更新雅可比矩阵。比较了两种算法的功能,并利用每种算法提取的5个参数对36电池光伏组件进行了仿真。将模拟结果与实验数据进行比较,以提供验证并确定每个过程在估计模型参数方面的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RU-Net: Solar Panel Detection From Remote Sensing Image A Multi-Objective Optimization for Clustering Buildings into Smart Microgrid Communities Optimal sizing of microgrid DERs for specialized critical load resilience Implementation of Chaotic Encryption Architecture on FPGA for On-Chip Secure Communication* Long Short-Term Memory Customer-Centric Power Outage Prediction Models for Weather-Related Power Outages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1