GANterfactual-RL: Understanding Reinforcement Learning Agents' Strategies through Visual Counterfactual Explanations

Tobias Huber, Maximilian Demmler, Silvan Mertes, Matthew Lyle Olson, Elisabeth Andr'e
{"title":"GANterfactual-RL: Understanding Reinforcement Learning Agents' Strategies through Visual Counterfactual Explanations","authors":"Tobias Huber, Maximilian Demmler, Silvan Mertes, Matthew Lyle Olson, Elisabeth Andr'e","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2302.12689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Counterfactual explanations are a common tool to explain artificial intelligence models. For Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents, they answer\"Why not?\"or\"What if?\"questions by illustrating what minimal change to a state is needed such that an agent chooses a different action. Generating counterfactual explanations for RL agents with visual input is especially challenging because of their large state spaces and because their decisions are part of an overarching policy, which includes long-term decision-making. However, research focusing on counterfactual explanations, specifically for RL agents with visual input, is scarce and does not go beyond identifying defective agents. It is unclear whether counterfactual explanations are still helpful for more complex tasks like analyzing the learned strategies of different agents or choosing a fitting agent for a specific task. We propose a novel but simple method to generate counterfactual explanations for RL agents by formulating the problem as a domain transfer problem which allows the use of adversarial learning techniques like StarGAN. Our method is fully model-agnostic and we demonstrate that it outperforms the only previous method in several computational metrics. Furthermore, we show in a user study that our method performs best when analyzing which strategies different agents pursue.","PeriodicalId":326727,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.12689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Counterfactual explanations are a common tool to explain artificial intelligence models. For Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents, they answer"Why not?"or"What if?"questions by illustrating what minimal change to a state is needed such that an agent chooses a different action. Generating counterfactual explanations for RL agents with visual input is especially challenging because of their large state spaces and because their decisions are part of an overarching policy, which includes long-term decision-making. However, research focusing on counterfactual explanations, specifically for RL agents with visual input, is scarce and does not go beyond identifying defective agents. It is unclear whether counterfactual explanations are still helpful for more complex tasks like analyzing the learned strategies of different agents or choosing a fitting agent for a specific task. We propose a novel but simple method to generate counterfactual explanations for RL agents by formulating the problem as a domain transfer problem which allows the use of adversarial learning techniques like StarGAN. Our method is fully model-agnostic and we demonstrate that it outperforms the only previous method in several computational metrics. Furthermore, we show in a user study that our method performs best when analyzing which strategies different agents pursue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反事实-强化学习:通过视觉反事实解释理解强化学习代理的策略
反事实解释是解释人工智能模型的常用工具。对于强化学习(RL)智能体,它们会回答“为什么不?”或“如果?”的问题,说明需要对状态进行多大的最小改变,才能让智能体选择不同的行为。为具有视觉输入的强化学习代理生成反事实解释尤其具有挑战性,因为它们的状态空间很大,而且它们的决策是总体政策的一部分,其中包括长期决策。然而,专注于反事实解释的研究,特别是针对具有视觉输入的RL代理的研究,很少,而且没有超越识别有缺陷的代理。目前尚不清楚反事实解释是否仍然有助于更复杂的任务,如分析不同代理的学习策略或为特定任务选择合适的代理。我们提出了一种新颖而简单的方法,通过将问题表述为允许使用StarGAN等对抗性学习技术的领域转移问题,为强化学习代理生成反事实解释。我们的方法是完全模型不可知的,并且我们证明它在几个计算指标上优于以前唯一的方法。此外,我们在用户研究中表明,我们的方法在分析不同代理所采取的策略时表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discovering Consistent Subelections Strategic Cost Selection in Participatory Budgeting Minimizing State Exploration While Searching Graphs with Unknown Obstacles vMFER: von Mises-Fisher Experience Resampling Based on Uncertainty of Gradient Directions for Policy Improvement of Actor-Critic Algorithms Reinforcement Nash Equilibrium Solver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1