Comparison of suitability of tracking marks for optical measurement of displacement

Luboš Kotek, Michal Holub, J. Vetiška, Kamil Subrt, Zdenek Hadaa, P. Blecha
{"title":"Comparison of suitability of tracking marks for optical measurement of displacement","authors":"Luboš Kotek, Michal Holub, J. Vetiška, Kamil Subrt, Zdenek Hadaa, P. Blecha","doi":"10.1109/MECHATRONIKA.2014.7018308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optical methods for measuring displacement is a key enabling technology allowing evaluate vibration of the light weighted objects. In optical evaluation of vibration of object displacement with high speed camera, systematical errors occurs in determining the displacement because of the tracking mark properties. The present article compares the results of optical tracking of four most common tracking marks (Filmmakin, Ridgeline creative, Eye fish and Blurry vision) and also own designed tracking mark (FMEIII). To verify the suitability of different tracking marks with high-speed camera, the test stand were constructed and measured data were compared to highspeed laser interferometer measurement.","PeriodicalId":430829,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika 2014","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika 2014","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MECHATRONIKA.2014.7018308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Optical methods for measuring displacement is a key enabling technology allowing evaluate vibration of the light weighted objects. In optical evaluation of vibration of object displacement with high speed camera, systematical errors occurs in determining the displacement because of the tracking mark properties. The present article compares the results of optical tracking of four most common tracking marks (Filmmakin, Ridgeline creative, Eye fish and Blurry vision) and also own designed tracking mark (FMEIII). To verify the suitability of different tracking marks with high-speed camera, the test stand were constructed and measured data were compared to highspeed laser interferometer measurement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
位移光学测量跟踪标记适用性的比较
光学位移测量方法是评估轻重量物体振动的关键技术。在高速相机对物体位移振动进行光学评估时,由于跟踪标记的特性,在确定位移时会产生系统误差。本文比较了四种最常见的跟踪标记(Filmmakin, Ridgeline creative, Eye fish和Blurry vision)和自己设计的跟踪标记(FMEIII)的光学跟踪结果。为了验证不同跟踪标记与高速摄像机的适用性,搭建了试验台,并与高速激光干涉仪测量数据进行了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Active vibration control strategies for a Free Piston Stirling Engine generator Recognition of the objects on the conveyor belt using graph matching algorithms Low cost fixed wing UAV for development of control laws Discrete and continuous fractional controllers Calculation of the vibration induction motor using the finite element method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1