Cesarean scar pregnancy mimicking a pseudo-gestational sac: A case report with magnetic resonance imaging findings

Hitomi Futaki, N. Oki, T. Maeda, Yoko Kashima, Mieko Inagaki, S. Yoshida
{"title":"Cesarean scar pregnancy mimicking a pseudo-gestational sac: A case report with magnetic resonance imaging findings","authors":"Hitomi Futaki, N. Oki, T. Maeda, Yoko Kashima, Mieko Inagaki, S. Yoshida","doi":"10.5348/100028g06hf2022cr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction: A corpus luteal cyst may reportedly be misidentified as an ectopic gestational sac. We report a case of cesarean scar pregnancy mimicking a pseudo-gestational sac, to differentiate between the two entities and diagnose correctly.\n\n Case Report: A 42-year-old woman with four previous cesarean sections, at 7 weeks of gestation, was suspected of an unknown site pregnancy. Transvaginal Doppler ultrasonography showed a small cystic structure accompanied by neither a yolk sac nor surrounding marginal flow, adjacent to the uterine scar, and a 16-mm-large low-echo area with a white ring in the left adnexa. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging also demonstrated a small cystic structure without contrast enhancement resembling a pseudo-gestational sac adjacent to the cesarean scar. Moreover, a cystic structure with ring-enhancement beside the left ovary, which mimicked an ectopic gestational sac, was also detected. Given these imaging findings and slightly elevated serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels, ectopic pregnancy in the left fallopian tube could not be ruled out. She underwent laparoscopic surgery and uterine content removal, which resulted in intrauterine miscarriage. The cystic structure partially resected from a marginal area in the ovary appeared to be a luteal cyst.\n\n Conclusion: For correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment, the clinical circumstances should be fully considered without excessive reliance on imaging findings.\n","PeriodicalId":436406,"journal":{"name":"Edorium Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edorium Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/100028g06hf2022cr","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A corpus luteal cyst may reportedly be misidentified as an ectopic gestational sac. We report a case of cesarean scar pregnancy mimicking a pseudo-gestational sac, to differentiate between the two entities and diagnose correctly. Case Report: A 42-year-old woman with four previous cesarean sections, at 7 weeks of gestation, was suspected of an unknown site pregnancy. Transvaginal Doppler ultrasonography showed a small cystic structure accompanied by neither a yolk sac nor surrounding marginal flow, adjacent to the uterine scar, and a 16-mm-large low-echo area with a white ring in the left adnexa. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging also demonstrated a small cystic structure without contrast enhancement resembling a pseudo-gestational sac adjacent to the cesarean scar. Moreover, a cystic structure with ring-enhancement beside the left ovary, which mimicked an ectopic gestational sac, was also detected. Given these imaging findings and slightly elevated serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels, ectopic pregnancy in the left fallopian tube could not be ruled out. She underwent laparoscopic surgery and uterine content removal, which resulted in intrauterine miscarriage. The cystic structure partially resected from a marginal area in the ovary appeared to be a luteal cyst. Conclusion: For correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment, the clinical circumstances should be fully considered without excessive reliance on imaging findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟假妊娠囊的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:1例磁共振成像结果报告
黄体囊肿有可能被误诊为异位妊娠囊。我们报告一例模仿假妊娠囊的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠,以区分两种实体并正确诊断。病例报告:一名42岁妇女,妊娠7周时曾4次剖宫产,疑似未知部位妊娠。经阴道多普勒超声示小囊性结构,未见卵黄囊,周围无边缘血流,毗邻子宫瘢痕,左侧附件低回声区,大16mm,见一白色环。盆腔磁共振成像也显示一个小囊性结构,没有增强,类似于剖宫产疤痕附近的假妊娠囊。此外,左侧卵巢旁还检出一环状增强的囊性结构,类似异位妊娠囊。鉴于这些影像学表现和血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)水平轻微升高,不能排除左输卵管异位妊娠。她接受了腹腔镜手术和子宫内容物去除,导致宫内流产。卵巢边缘部分切除的囊性结构为黄体囊肿。结论:为了正确诊断和治疗,应充分考虑临床情况,不要过度依赖影像学表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: A case report and review of the literature Validation of Sinhala and Tamil translations of the motherisk: Pregnancy unique quantification of emesis (PUQE) scoring system Intestinal incarceration following aspiration evacuation: A case report Umbilical endometriosis: A case report Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule revealing an ovarian adenocarcinoma: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1