Comparative Analysis of Speech Behavior Stereotypes in the Speech of Children and Adults

O.M. Dedova, V. Kornev
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Speech Behavior Stereotypes in the Speech of Children and Adults","authors":"O.M. Dedova, V. Kornev","doi":"10.17759/langt.2022090306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stereotyped lexical units are presented to the recipient as carriers of some relatively stable connotative, emotional and evaluative motivation. The achievement of the desired effect is explained, in particular, by the fact that the communication process, as a rule, occurs in non-verbal activity, and the personal meaning is also assimilated by the individual within the framework of non-verbal activity. The effectiveness of the influence of the stereotype on the consciousness of the individual is due to the explicitly expressed emotionality present in it. Figurative comparisons, rhyme, alliteration, and elements of conversational style act as factors that enhance the emotionality of stereotypes. The emergence of stereotypes is also associated with ethnopsycholinguistic factors. The reasons for the appearance of stereotypes in children's speech and in the speech of adults are directly opposite. In adult speech, the use of the name of a specific situation in place of the name of abstract semantics is permissible due to the existence of some ready-made schemes, since both the speaker and the listener possess a mechanism for determining the generality of class indicators, systematizing them, including them in the designation paradigm. In a child, the use of an utterance to denote an entire situation marks the process of building a paradigm of designation, the development of class indicators and their generalization. Therefore, conversational stereotypes are more widespread in the speech of adults than in the speech of children.","PeriodicalId":414200,"journal":{"name":"Язык и текст","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Язык и текст","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/langt.2022090306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stereotyped lexical units are presented to the recipient as carriers of some relatively stable connotative, emotional and evaluative motivation. The achievement of the desired effect is explained, in particular, by the fact that the communication process, as a rule, occurs in non-verbal activity, and the personal meaning is also assimilated by the individual within the framework of non-verbal activity. The effectiveness of the influence of the stereotype on the consciousness of the individual is due to the explicitly expressed emotionality present in it. Figurative comparisons, rhyme, alliteration, and elements of conversational style act as factors that enhance the emotionality of stereotypes. The emergence of stereotypes is also associated with ethnopsycholinguistic factors. The reasons for the appearance of stereotypes in children's speech and in the speech of adults are directly opposite. In adult speech, the use of the name of a specific situation in place of the name of abstract semantics is permissible due to the existence of some ready-made schemes, since both the speaker and the listener possess a mechanism for determining the generality of class indicators, systematizing them, including them in the designation paradigm. In a child, the use of an utterance to denote an entire situation marks the process of building a paradigm of designation, the development of class indicators and their generalization. Therefore, conversational stereotypes are more widespread in the speech of adults than in the speech of children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童与成人言语行为刻板印象的比较分析
刻板的词汇单位作为某种相对稳定的内涵动机、情感动机和评价动机的载体呈现给接受者。预期效果的实现特别可以用以下事实来解释,即交际过程通常发生在非语言活动中,个人意义也在非语言活动的框架内被个人同化。刻板印象对个体意识影响的有效性是由于其中明确表达的情绪。比喻比较、押韵、头韵和会话风格的元素都是增强刻板印象的情绪性的因素。刻板印象的出现也与民族心理语言因素有关。刻板印象在儿童言语中出现的原因和在成人言语中出现的原因是完全相反的。在成人言语中,由于存在一些现成的方案,使用特定情况的名称来代替抽象语义的名称是允许的,因为说话者和听者都拥有一种机制来确定类别指示的普遍性,将它们系统化,并将它们包含在指定范式中。在儿童中,使用话语来表示整个情况标志着建立指定范式的过程,阶级指标的发展及其概括。因此,会话刻板印象在成人言语中比在儿童言语中更为普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of the Role of the Library in the Context of Preservating National Languages Vladimir Monomakh’s Role in the Development of Literature and System of State at Rus The Role of Teachers in Promoting Autonomous Language Learning: The Case of Addis Ababa Science and Technology University Lexical and Stylistic Analysis of Advertising Texts through the Erich Fromm's Philosophy (“To Have or to Be?”) (on the Example of Posts Published in the Official Telegram Channel of Federal Agency for Youth Affairs (“Rosmolodezh”)) Speech Formulas Serving the Everyday Discourse of the Shangodinsky Dialect of the Avar Language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1