Assessing the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognition in Major Depressive Disorder Using Computerized Cognitive Testing

C. Galletly, S. Gill, Ashlee Rigby, Benjamin L. Carnell, P. Clarke
{"title":"Assessing the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognition in Major Depressive Disorder Using Computerized Cognitive Testing","authors":"C. Galletly, S. Gill, Ashlee Rigby, Benjamin L. Carnell, P. Clarke","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives A range of different treatment approaches are available for depression; however, there is an ongoing concern about the cognitive impairment associated with many treatments. This study investigated the effect of treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognition in patients with major depressive disorder. Cognition before and after treatment was assessed using a computerized cognitive testing battery, which provided comprehensive assessment across a range of cognitive domains. This was a naturalistic study involving patients attending an outpatient clinical rTMS service. Methods A total of 63 patients with treatment-resistant depression completed the IntegNeuro cognitive test battery, a well-validated comprehensive computerized assessment tool before and after receiving 18 or 20 treatments of sequential bilateral rTMS. Change in the various cognitive domains was assessed, and analyses were undertaken to determine whether any change in cognition was associated with a change in rating of depression severity. Results There was a significant decrease in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores from baseline to posttreatment. There was no decline in performance on any of the cognitive tests. There were significant improvements in maze completion time and the number of errors in the maze task. However, these were accounted for by improvement in mood when change in depressive symptoms was included as a covariate. Conclusions This open-label study provides further support for the efficacy and safety of rTMS as a treatment option for people with major depressive disorder in a naturalistic clinical setting. Using a comprehensive, robust computerized battery of cognitive tests, the current study indicated that there was no significant cognitive impairment associated with rTMS and that any improvements in cognitive functioning were associated with a reduction in depressive symptoms.","PeriodicalId":287576,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ECT","volume":"482 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ECT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objectives A range of different treatment approaches are available for depression; however, there is an ongoing concern about the cognitive impairment associated with many treatments. This study investigated the effect of treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognition in patients with major depressive disorder. Cognition before and after treatment was assessed using a computerized cognitive testing battery, which provided comprehensive assessment across a range of cognitive domains. This was a naturalistic study involving patients attending an outpatient clinical rTMS service. Methods A total of 63 patients with treatment-resistant depression completed the IntegNeuro cognitive test battery, a well-validated comprehensive computerized assessment tool before and after receiving 18 or 20 treatments of sequential bilateral rTMS. Change in the various cognitive domains was assessed, and analyses were undertaken to determine whether any change in cognition was associated with a change in rating of depression severity. Results There was a significant decrease in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores from baseline to posttreatment. There was no decline in performance on any of the cognitive tests. There were significant improvements in maze completion time and the number of errors in the maze task. However, these were accounted for by improvement in mood when change in depressive symptoms was included as a covariate. Conclusions This open-label study provides further support for the efficacy and safety of rTMS as a treatment option for people with major depressive disorder in a naturalistic clinical setting. Using a comprehensive, robust computerized battery of cognitive tests, the current study indicated that there was no significant cognitive impairment associated with rTMS and that any improvements in cognitive functioning were associated with a reduction in depressive symptoms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用计算机认知测试评估重复经颅磁刺激对重度抑郁症认知的影响
抑郁症有一系列不同的治疗方法;然而,有一个持续关注的认知障碍与许多治疗相关。本研究探讨重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗对重度抑郁症患者认知功能的影响。治疗前后的认知使用计算机化的认知测试电池进行评估,该电池提供了一系列认知领域的综合评估。这是一项自然主义研究,涉及参加门诊临床rTMS服务的患者。方法63例难治性抑郁症患者在接受18或20次序贯双侧rTMS治疗前后分别完成了IntegNeuro认知测试,这是一种经过验证的综合计算机评估工具。评估了不同认知领域的变化,并进行了分析,以确定认知的任何变化是否与抑郁症严重程度评级的变化有关。结果两组患者汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表评分较治疗前显著降低。他们在任何认知测试中的表现都没有下降。在迷宫完成时间和迷宫任务的错误数量上有显著的改善。然而,当抑郁症状的改变作为协变量被包括在内时,这些都是通过情绪的改善来解释的。结论:这项开放标签研究进一步支持了rTMS在自然临床环境下作为重度抑郁症患者治疗选择的有效性和安全性。目前的研究使用了一组全面的、强大的计算机化认知测试,表明rTMS没有显著的认知损伤,认知功能的任何改善都与抑郁症状的减轻有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why You Should Collect Routine Clinical Data for ECT: A Singapore Story From the CARE Network. Extreme Agitation in Mania Treated With Intravenous Continuous Infusion of Dexmedetomidine and ECT. Availability of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Public Health Services in the Last Decade in Brazil Psychotropic Medication Effects on Seizure Threshold and Seizure Duration During Electroconvulsive Therapy Stimulus Titration Review Leerboek Elektroconvulsietherapie: Editors: Verwey, B, van Waarde J. Uitgeverij Boom|de Tijdstroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1