Sentiment analysis of mass rapid transit jakarta using naïve bayes classifier and rule-based opinion target detection on Twitter

Dhanika Jeihan Aguinta, P. P. Adikara, R. Wihandika
{"title":"Sentiment analysis of mass rapid transit jakarta using naïve bayes classifier and rule-based opinion target detection on Twitter","authors":"Dhanika Jeihan Aguinta, P. P. Adikara, R. Wihandika","doi":"10.1145/3427423.3427437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) is a national project in Indonesia that has been operated since the beginning of 2019 for phase 1 and still under further development. People's opinions posted on Twitter concerning Jakarta MRT could become an evaluation material, viewed from the sentiment score and object of the opinion. To analyze the sentiment score, opinion sentiment classified using the naive Bayes classifier, followed by rule-based target opinion detection. The classification process is using bag of words (BoW) features and lexicon-based features. In the weighting process of the Lexicon-based features and detection of the target opinion, POS tagging is employed to get the word class. In determining the target opinion object, the POS tagging result is used to do chunking that has specific rules, specific to noun-phrase (NP) tags. Therefore, the obtained sentiment class and object become the target in the opinion. Using Naïve Bayes with the bag of words features and lexicon-based, we achieve precision 0,92, recall 1,0, f-measure 0,95, and accuracy 0,92. The results of the rule-based target opinion detection are 0.78, 0.85, 0.79, and 0.75 for precision, recall, f-measure, and accuracy, respectively.","PeriodicalId":120194,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3427423.3427437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) is a national project in Indonesia that has been operated since the beginning of 2019 for phase 1 and still under further development. People's opinions posted on Twitter concerning Jakarta MRT could become an evaluation material, viewed from the sentiment score and object of the opinion. To analyze the sentiment score, opinion sentiment classified using the naive Bayes classifier, followed by rule-based target opinion detection. The classification process is using bag of words (BoW) features and lexicon-based features. In the weighting process of the Lexicon-based features and detection of the target opinion, POS tagging is employed to get the word class. In determining the target opinion object, the POS tagging result is used to do chunking that has specific rules, specific to noun-phrase (NP) tags. Therefore, the obtained sentiment class and object become the target in the opinion. Using Naïve Bayes with the bag of words features and lexicon-based, we achieve precision 0,92, recall 1,0, f-measure 0,95, and accuracy 0,92. The results of the rule-based target opinion detection are 0.78, 0.85, 0.79, and 0.75 for precision, recall, f-measure, and accuracy, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于naïve贝叶斯分类器和Twitter上基于规则的意见目标检测的雅加达捷运情感分析
雅加达捷运(MRT)是印度尼西亚的一个国家项目,自2019年初开始运营,目前仍在进一步开发中。人们在Twitter上发布的关于雅加达捷运的意见,可以从情绪得分和意见的对象来看,成为一种评价材料。为了分析情感得分,使用朴素贝叶斯分类器对意见情感进行分类,然后进行基于规则的目标意见检测。分类过程采用词包特征和基于词典的特征。在基于词典的特征加权和目标意见检测过程中,使用词性标注来获取词类。在确定目标意见对象时,使用词性标注结果进行具有特定规则的分块,具体到名词短语(NP)标记。因此,获得的情感类和对象成为意见中的目标。使用Naïve贝叶斯与词包特征和基于词典,我们实现了精度0.92,召回率1,0,f-measure 0.95和准确率0.92。基于规则的目标意见检测的精度、召回率、f-measure和准确度分别为0.78、0.85、0.79和0.75。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rank consistency of TOPSIS in mobile based recommendation system Detection of online review spam: a literature review A comparative analysis of usability evaluation methods of academic mobile application: are four methods better? Evaluation of multivariate transductive neuro-fuzzy inference system for multivariate time-series analysis and modelling Comparison of image thresholding and clustering segmentation methods for understanding nutritional content of food images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1