Law And Morality: The Hart And Fuller Debate

B. Bakti, M. Tarigan
{"title":"Law And Morality: The Hart And Fuller Debate","authors":"B. Bakti, M. Tarigan","doi":"10.24815/sklj.v6i2.29123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to explain how the relationship between law and morality in the H.L Hart and Fuller debate. The relationship between law and morality in the development of legal science is inseparable from legal and morality debates. Legal positivism scientists place law and morals separately, while natural law scientists place law and morals as inseparable. In this case, the author tries to recall how the post-World War II conditions were shocked by the debate between British legal scientists and American legal scientists, namely H.L.A Hart and Lon Fuller.","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i2.29123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to explain how the relationship between law and morality in the H.L Hart and Fuller debate. The relationship between law and morality in the development of legal science is inseparable from legal and morality debates. Legal positivism scientists place law and morals separately, while natural law scientists place law and morals as inseparable. In this case, the author tries to recall how the post-World War II conditions were shocked by the debate between British legal scientists and American legal scientists, namely H.L.A Hart and Lon Fuller.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律与道德:哈特与富勒之争
本文旨在解释h.l.哈特与富勒辩论中法律与道德的关系。法学发展中法律与道德的关系离不开法律与道德之争。法律实证主义科学家将法律与道德分开,而自然法科学家则将法律与道德密不可分。在这种情况下,作者试图回顾二战后的情况是如何被英国法律学家和美国法律学家,即H.L.A Hart和Lon Fuller之间的争论所震惊的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Integration of Judicial Review in Indonesia Aceh’s Government Role Implementation in Overcoming Emergency of Natural Disaster and Outbreak of Diseases LEGAL STUDY ON THE ACTION OF PKPU ADMINISTRATORS THAT CONDUCTED ILLEGAL INCREASE OF CREDITORS’ RECEIVABLES The Perspectives of Legal Progressivism Concerning Song Royalty Payments Actions By KPI As A Supervisory Institution Against Advertisements That Violate Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1