First Year STEM Students’ Satisfaction with Peer Mentoring: A Predictor for Student Retention

D. Spaulding, J. A. Kennedy, Amanda Rózsavölgyi, Wilfredo Colón
{"title":"First Year STEM Students’ Satisfaction with Peer Mentoring: A Predictor for Student Retention","authors":"D. Spaulding, J. A. Kennedy, Amanda Rózsavölgyi, Wilfredo Colón","doi":"10.51355/jstem.2022.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer mentoring is often used as a method to help retain first year STEM students. This study addressed the following research question: Can we predict in the first semester which first- year STEM students will return as sophomores and which ones will not? And if so, what factors were the best predictors of STEM students returning? An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was first employed and identified four factors: Academic Skills, Satisfaction with Mentors, Institutional Fit, and Academic Relationships). Next a binary regression was performed, and results showed that in the first semester of study student satisfaction with the university (i.e., Institutional Fit) was the most significant and greatest contributor for predicting students returning their sophomore year, followed by forming Academic Relationships; all of which was the result of participating in the mentoring program. Gender and race were not significant predictors for retention; however, further examination of the study’s effect size found the effect size to be .4, low moderate, meaning the study’s results are somewhat important. It is recommended the study be replicated with a smaller sample.","PeriodicalId":252126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in STEM Education","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in STEM Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2022.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer mentoring is often used as a method to help retain first year STEM students. This study addressed the following research question: Can we predict in the first semester which first- year STEM students will return as sophomores and which ones will not? And if so, what factors were the best predictors of STEM students returning? An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was first employed and identified four factors: Academic Skills, Satisfaction with Mentors, Institutional Fit, and Academic Relationships). Next a binary regression was performed, and results showed that in the first semester of study student satisfaction with the university (i.e., Institutional Fit) was the most significant and greatest contributor for predicting students returning their sophomore year, followed by forming Academic Relationships; all of which was the result of participating in the mentoring program. Gender and race were not significant predictors for retention; however, further examination of the study’s effect size found the effect size to be .4, low moderate, meaning the study’s results are somewhat important. It is recommended the study be replicated with a smaller sample.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一年级STEM学生对同伴辅导的满意度:学生留任的预测因子
同伴指导通常被用作帮助留住一年级STEM学生的方法。本研究针对以下研究问题:我们能否在第一学期预测哪些一年级STEM学生将作为二年级学生返回,哪些不会?如果是这样的话,哪些因素最能预测STEM学生的回归?首先采用探索性因素分析(EFA)确定了四个因素:学术技能、对导师的满意度、机构契合度和学术关系。结果显示,在第一学期的学习中,学生对学校的满意度(即机构契合度)是预测学生在大二返校的最显著和最大的因素,其次是形成学术关系;所有这些都是参加辅导计划的结果。性别和种族不是留存率的显著预测因素;然而,进一步检查研究的效应量发现效应量为0.4,低中等,这意味着研究结果有些重要。建议用更小的样本重复这项研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do STEM teachers have the potential to become leaders in online education? A comic-based conservation lesson plan diversifies middle school student conceptions of scientists Effectiveness of an Inquiry Focused Professional Development: Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Instruction Pathways to Teacher STEM Certification in Texas: A Case for Addressing the Minority Teacher Shortage Categorizing Classroom-based Argumentation in Elementary STEM Lessons: Applying Walton’s Types of Argument Dialogue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1