From the rationalism abandonment to the return to rationality

Valentin Margineanu
{"title":"From the rationalism abandonment to the return to rationality","authors":"Valentin Margineanu","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article represents a plea for the return to rationality in law by approaching the fundamental aspect, the material aspect of rationality in law, that rationality which allows the identification of criteria for evaluating the legitimacy of law and the relationship between Law and Act. In this context, a historical retrospective of the evolution of the concept of rationality in law is carried out, which demonstrates the need to continue this theoretical approach until it becomes a reality in the conditions in which we aim to overcome the gap between the theoretical and applied framework, and the getting out of the crisis of law. Also, the vital necessity to return to rationality in law is justified, including through practical but also scientific arguments. At the same time, the study represents an appeal, a call to return to rationality and responsibility in the knowledge and application of the law and to continue efforts in order to achieve this desideratum.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"190 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2023.1(64).03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article represents a plea for the return to rationality in law by approaching the fundamental aspect, the material aspect of rationality in law, that rationality which allows the identification of criteria for evaluating the legitimacy of law and the relationship between Law and Act. In this context, a historical retrospective of the evolution of the concept of rationality in law is carried out, which demonstrates the need to continue this theoretical approach until it becomes a reality in the conditions in which we aim to overcome the gap between the theoretical and applied framework, and the getting out of the crisis of law. Also, the vital necessity to return to rationality in law is justified, including through practical but also scientific arguments. At the same time, the study represents an appeal, a call to return to rationality and responsibility in the knowledge and application of the law and to continue efforts in order to achieve this desideratum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从抛弃理性主义到回归理性
本文通过探讨法律合理性的基本方面,即法律合理性的物质方面,即允许确定评估法律合法性和法律与行为之间关系的标准的合理性,代表了对回归法律合理性的请求。在此背景下,本文对法律理性概念的演变进行了历史回顾,表明在我们旨在克服理论框架与应用框架之间的差距,走出法律危机的条件下,有必要继续这种理论方法,直到它成为现实。此外,在法律上回归理性的至关重要的必要性是合理的,包括通过实践和科学论证。同时,这项研究代表了一种呼吁,呼吁在认识和适用法律方面恢复理性和负责任,并继续努力实现这一愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of informational technologies in the education of drtainees: foreign experience and legal regulation Criminological specificity of war crimes, their difference from crimes against humanity and genocide Applicability of the ECHR case law within the judicial higher Court remedy examination Presumption of innocence in the doctrinal and regulatory sources of Western Europe (XIX-XX centuries) The presumption of lack of sexual consent in the case of a minor victim: a model of inspiration for the Moldovan legislator?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1