Explaining Vietnam’s Boom in Business Litigation

Q. Quach, S. McGinty
{"title":"Explaining Vietnam’s Boom in Business Litigation","authors":"Q. Quach, S. McGinty","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3418759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, Vietnamese courts have faced a caseload that is increasing at a rate of ten to twelve percent annually. The Economic Courts, which handle business related cases, have been most affected by this trend, seeing the growth in their caseload outpace that in the regular civil court system. This paper examines the explanatory power of three factors – cultural, institutional and economic – in determining this explosion in the number of business disputes litigated in the Economic Courts. <br><br>Using data from 2003 to 2012, the paper finds that institutional and economic factors rather than cultural ones offer the best explanations for this upward trend in the number of business cases in Vietnam. The findings enrich the literature on institutions in transition economies, by identifying them as determinants of choice of enforcement devices. This contributes to the debate on choice of enforcement device by providing evidence from both an Asian country and a transition economy. The research findings may also inform current legal reform in countries which have been allured by the model of strong private enforcement in the United States.","PeriodicalId":412394,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Economic Law (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Economic Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3418759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, Vietnamese courts have faced a caseload that is increasing at a rate of ten to twelve percent annually. The Economic Courts, which handle business related cases, have been most affected by this trend, seeing the growth in their caseload outpace that in the regular civil court system. This paper examines the explanatory power of three factors – cultural, institutional and economic – in determining this explosion in the number of business disputes litigated in the Economic Courts.

Using data from 2003 to 2012, the paper finds that institutional and economic factors rather than cultural ones offer the best explanations for this upward trend in the number of business cases in Vietnam. The findings enrich the literature on institutions in transition economies, by identifying them as determinants of choice of enforcement devices. This contributes to the debate on choice of enforcement device by providing evidence from both an Asian country and a transition economy. The research findings may also inform current legal reform in countries which have been allured by the model of strong private enforcement in the United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释越南商业诉讼的繁荣
近年来,越南法院面临的案件数量以每年10%到12%的速度增长。处理与商业有关的案件的经济法庭受这一趋势的影响最大,其案件数量的增长超过了普通民事法庭系统。本文考察了三个因素的解释力——文化、制度和经济——在决定经济法院提起诉讼的商业纠纷数量激增方面的作用。使用2003年至2012年的数据,本文发现制度和经济因素而不是文化因素为越南商业案例数量的上升趋势提供了最好的解释。研究结果丰富了关于转型经济体制度的文献,将它们确定为选择执行手段的决定因素。通过提供来自亚洲国家和转型经济体的证据,这有助于关于执行手段选择的辩论。研究结果也可为那些被美国强有力的私人执法模式所吸引的国家目前的法律改革提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Executive Pay Clawbacks and Their Taxation Investment and Human Rights in the Shadow of the Pandemic: Recent Developments in 2020 University of Leeds School of Law 2021 Liberty Fellowship Address, Regulating Digital Currencies: Central Bank-Sponsored and Stablecoins The Emperors Old Bonds - Pre-1950 Debts of Imperial Chinese Government JCOERE Judicial Cooperation Supporting Economic Recovery in Europe Report 1: Identifying Substantive Rules in Preventive Restructuring Frameworks Including the Preventive Restructuring Directive which May Be Incompatible with Judicial Cooperation Obligations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1