WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE

M. Gilson
{"title":"WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE","authors":"M. Gilson","doi":"10.1515/9780691201580-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The popularity of academic social networks like ResearchGate and Academia .edu indicates that scholars want to share their work, yet for universities with open access (OA) policies, these sites may be competing with institutional repos - itories for content. Our study seeks to reveal researcher practices, attitudes, and motivations around uploading their work to ResearchGate and complying with an institutional Open Access Policy. We conducted a population study to examine the participation by 558 full‐ time University of Rhode Island faculty members in the OA Policy and Research - Gate, followed by a survey of 728 full‐ time URI faculty members about their participation in the two services.","PeriodicalId":415633,"journal":{"name":"How to Think like Shakespeare","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"How to Think like Shakespeare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691201580-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The popularity of academic social networks like ResearchGate and Academia .edu indicates that scholars want to share their work, yet for universities with open access (OA) policies, these sites may be competing with institutional repos - itories for content. Our study seeks to reveal researcher practices, attitudes, and motivations around uploading their work to ResearchGate and complying with an institutional Open Access Policy. We conducted a population study to examine the participation by 558 full‐ time University of Rhode Island faculty members in the OA Policy and Research - Gate, followed by a survey of 728 full‐ time URI faculty members about their participation in the two services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去的一切只是序幕
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
9. OF EXERCISES 13. OF MAKING 1. OF THINKING 8. OF IMITATION INDEX
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1