Why isn’t the addressing of intersectional discrimination and disadvantage a key leadership priority in English schools?

Joanne Trevenna
{"title":"Why isn’t the addressing of intersectional discrimination and disadvantage a key leadership priority in English schools?","authors":"Joanne Trevenna","doi":"10.1177/27526461231160187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores current accountability mechanisms for the leadership of equality, equity, diversity and inclusion in addressing intersectional discrimination faced by pupils in English schools. I draw on the work of Kimberlé Crenshaw and Patricia Hill Collins in the critical framing of intersectional discrimination and the work of UK-based academics, notably David Gillborn, in examining the impact of intersectional discrimination on pupils in the English education system. I argue that an intersectional approach can deepen understanding and acknowledge the complexities of human identity and therefore offer more sophisticated support systems for pupils. The dangers of diluting the recognition of the impact of singular, shared identity attributes are considered in the context of power hierarchies at the points of intersection and balanced against the recognition that a focus on single characteristics and a totalising view of identity may reduce understanding which can then limit equity action for equality.","PeriodicalId":183631,"journal":{"name":"Equity in Education & Society","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equity in Education & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27526461231160187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores current accountability mechanisms for the leadership of equality, equity, diversity and inclusion in addressing intersectional discrimination faced by pupils in English schools. I draw on the work of Kimberlé Crenshaw and Patricia Hill Collins in the critical framing of intersectional discrimination and the work of UK-based academics, notably David Gillborn, in examining the impact of intersectional discrimination on pupils in the English education system. I argue that an intersectional approach can deepen understanding and acknowledge the complexities of human identity and therefore offer more sophisticated support systems for pupils. The dangers of diluting the recognition of the impact of singular, shared identity attributes are considered in the context of power hierarchies at the points of intersection and balanced against the recognition that a focus on single characteristics and a totalising view of identity may reduce understanding which can then limit equity action for equality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么解决交叉歧视和劣势不是英语学校领导的一个关键优先事项?
本文探讨了在解决英语学校学生面临的交叉歧视问题时,平等、公平、多样性和包容性领导的现行问责机制。我借鉴了金伯利·洛伊尔·克伦肖(kimberl Crenshaw)和帕特里夏·希尔·柯林斯(Patricia Hill Collins)在交叉歧视的关键框架方面的工作,以及英国学者,尤其是大卫·吉尔伯恩(David Gillborn)在研究英国教育体系中交叉歧视对学生的影响方面的工作。我认为,交叉方法可以加深理解和承认人类身份的复杂性,从而为学生提供更复杂的支持系统。在交叉点的权力等级背景下,考虑了稀释对单一、共享身份属性影响的认识的危险,并与对单一特征的关注和对身份的总体看法可能会减少理解的认识相平衡,从而限制平等的公平行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the dual pandemic experiences of Black male engineering students Natural mentoring for males of color transitioning to college Absence & presence: The six racism-in-education-processes (‘the 6 REP’) Students’ perceptions of the quality and utility of assessment feedback: Implications for educational leadership and quality assurance Corrigendum to “A call for reform: Education’s role in strengthening democracy”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1