{"title":"Creditor Rights, Debt Capacity and Securities Issuance: Evidence from Anti-Recharacterization Laws","authors":"Daniel Tut","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3541924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the effects of improvement in creditors’ rights protection on firms’ \nfinancing choices and securities issuance. To address these issues, I exploit exogenous variation \nin creditors’ rights protection induced by the staggered adoption of anti-recharacterization laws \nby some U.S. states. The laws enhance the ability of creditors to repossess collateral during \nbankruptcy. Using a difference-in-difference methodology to estimate the causal impacts, I find \nthat: [1] the laws are positively related to debt capacity and debt maturity. Firms increase \nmarket leverage and substitute away from costly short-term debt financing into long-term \ndebt financing [2] the laws are positively related to debt issuance [3] the laws are negatively \nrelated to equity issuance. My analysis further demonstrates that proactive securities issuers \nare significantly more responsive to the adoption of anti-recharacterization laws than passive \nsecurities issuers","PeriodicalId":119398,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Fiscal & Monetary Policy eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Fiscal & Monetary Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3541924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This paper examines the effects of improvement in creditors’ rights protection on firms’
financing choices and securities issuance. To address these issues, I exploit exogenous variation
in creditors’ rights protection induced by the staggered adoption of anti-recharacterization laws
by some U.S. states. The laws enhance the ability of creditors to repossess collateral during
bankruptcy. Using a difference-in-difference methodology to estimate the causal impacts, I find
that: [1] the laws are positively related to debt capacity and debt maturity. Firms increase
market leverage and substitute away from costly short-term debt financing into long-term
debt financing [2] the laws are positively related to debt issuance [3] the laws are negatively
related to equity issuance. My analysis further demonstrates that proactive securities issuers
are significantly more responsive to the adoption of anti-recharacterization laws than passive
securities issuers