BENCHMARKING METODE RANCANG BANGUN WATERFALL DAN PEMODELAN BERBASIS OBJEK

Moch. Khusien Bagaskoro, M. A. Chakim, Mohammad Nurul Hilal, One Thowimma
{"title":"BENCHMARKING METODE RANCANG BANGUN WATERFALL DAN PEMODELAN BERBASIS OBJEK","authors":"Moch. Khusien Bagaskoro, M. A. Chakim, Mohammad Nurul Hilal, One Thowimma","doi":"10.47111/jti.v15i2.3000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a research Benchmarking Waterfall Design Method and Object-Based Modeling. Software development has many models, software methodologies have evolved from time to time, including the Waterfall approach and the UML (Unified Modeling Language) approach. Waterfall is a software development model that is carried out sequentially and very systematically. Meanwhile, UML is a visual modeling method that serves as a means of designing object-oriented systems. The difference between the two models is that Waterfall is a structured method, while UML is a system analysis method, a representation of the programming method. This study aims to perform a comparison or benchmarking of each of these software models, which can assist in determining the most suitable model for the current software development process. The method used in this research is descriptive quantitative method, which analyzes data by describing or describing the data that has been collected as it is. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the UML method is most suitable for software development, because UML in terms of development, is a method that has undergone evolution from previous methods, so this method can follow the use of users in designing projects on a medium to large scale. That are relevant to the current developments","PeriodicalId":214711,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknologi Informasi: Jurnal Keilmuan dan Aplikasi Bidang Teknik Informatika","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknologi Informasi: Jurnal Keilmuan dan Aplikasi Bidang Teknik Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47111/jti.v15i2.3000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research is a research Benchmarking Waterfall Design Method and Object-Based Modeling. Software development has many models, software methodologies have evolved from time to time, including the Waterfall approach and the UML (Unified Modeling Language) approach. Waterfall is a software development model that is carried out sequentially and very systematically. Meanwhile, UML is a visual modeling method that serves as a means of designing object-oriented systems. The difference between the two models is that Waterfall is a structured method, while UML is a system analysis method, a representation of the programming method. This study aims to perform a comparison or benchmarking of each of these software models, which can assist in determining the most suitable model for the current software development process. The method used in this research is descriptive quantitative method, which analyzes data by describing or describing the data that has been collected as it is. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the UML method is most suitable for software development, because UML in terms of development, is a method that has undergone evolution from previous methods, so this method can follow the use of users in designing projects on a medium to large scale. That are relevant to the current developments
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械标记设计瀑布和基于物体的模型
本研究是对瀑布设计方法和基于对象建模的研究。软件开发有许多模型,软件方法也不断发展,包括瀑布方法和UML(统一建模语言)方法。瀑布式开发是一种软件开发模型,它是顺序地、非常系统地进行的。同时,UML是一种可视化的建模方法,可以作为设计面向对象系统的手段。两种模型的不同之处在于,Waterfall是一种结构化的方法,而UML是一种系统分析方法,一种编程方法的表示。这项研究的目的是对这些软件模型中的每一个进行比较或基准测试,这可以帮助确定最适合当前软件开发过程的模型。本研究使用的方法是描述性定量方法,通过描述或描述已经收集到的数据来分析数据。从本研究的结果可以得出,UML方法是最适合于软件开发的,因为UML在开发方面,是一种从以前的方法进化而来的方法,所以这种方法可以跟随用户在中大型项目设计中的使用。这些都与当前的事态发展有关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PERANCANGAN APLIKASI BIMBINGAN BELAJAR ONLINE KOMPARASI ALGORITMA NAIVE BAYES DAN K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR PADA ANALISIS SENTIMEN TERHADAP ULASAN PENGGUNA APLIKASI TOKOPEDIA RANCANG BANGUN SISTEM DETEKSI KEMATANGAN BUAH KELAPA SAWIT BERDASARKAN DETEKSI WARNA MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA K-NN SMARTBOX PENERIMA PAKET BELANJA ONLINE PERANCANGAN APLIKASI KAMUS DIGITAL BAHASA LAWANGAN – BAHASA INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1