Antepartum biopsychosocial risk and perinatal outcome.

Family practice research journal Pub Date : 1992-12-01
J A Herrera, H Hurtado, D Cáceres
{"title":"Antepartum biopsychosocial risk and perinatal outcome.","authors":"J A Herrera,&nbsp;H Hurtado,&nbsp;D Cáceres","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes a study of biomedical and psychosocial risks and the perinatal outcome. Two hundred nineteen pregnant women completed three instruments to identify their biomedical and psychosocial risk: anxiety, family function, life events. Biomedical risk was assessed through analyses of self-reported health histories. Information on complications of pregnancy, labor, and delivery was obtained from the hospital delivery records. In the sample studied, biomedical risk alone was not substantially related to perinatal complications. Four psychosocial items were the best psychosocial predictors of perinatal complications: emotional tension; depressive humor; neurovegetative symptoms of anxiety; and dissatisfaction with the time, space, and money shared with the family (p < 0.05). The interaction between these critical psychosocial items and biomedical risk also reliably predicted complications (p < 0.00001). The results of this study suggest that psychosocial risk assessment alone and in interaction with biomedical risk assessment may significantly improve the ability to identify women who may experience perinatal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"12 4","pages":"391-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes a study of biomedical and psychosocial risks and the perinatal outcome. Two hundred nineteen pregnant women completed three instruments to identify their biomedical and psychosocial risk: anxiety, family function, life events. Biomedical risk was assessed through analyses of self-reported health histories. Information on complications of pregnancy, labor, and delivery was obtained from the hospital delivery records. In the sample studied, biomedical risk alone was not substantially related to perinatal complications. Four psychosocial items were the best psychosocial predictors of perinatal complications: emotional tension; depressive humor; neurovegetative symptoms of anxiety; and dissatisfaction with the time, space, and money shared with the family (p < 0.05). The interaction between these critical psychosocial items and biomedical risk also reliably predicted complications (p < 0.00001). The results of this study suggest that psychosocial risk assessment alone and in interaction with biomedical risk assessment may significantly improve the ability to identify women who may experience perinatal complications.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前生物心理社会风险与围产儿结局。
本文描述了一项生物医学和社会心理风险和围产期结局的研究。219名孕妇完成了确定其生物医学和社会心理风险的三项工具:焦虑、家庭功能、生活事件。通过分析自我报告的健康史来评估生物医学风险。从医院的分娩记录中获得了有关妊娠、分娩和分娩并发症的信息。在研究的样本中,生物医学风险本身与围产期并发症没有实质性关系。四个社会心理项目是围产期并发症的最佳社会心理预测指标:情绪紧张;抑郁的幽默;焦虑的神经植物症状;对与家人分享时间、空间、金钱的不满意程度(p < 0.05)。这些关键的社会心理项目和生物医学风险之间的相互作用也可靠地预测了并发症(p < 0.00001)。这项研究的结果表明,单独的社会心理风险评估以及与生物医学风险评估的相互作用可以显著提高识别可能经历围产期并发症的妇女的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of survey research. Desirable features of qualitative research. Consideration of venue and vehicle in health behavior research with adolescents. Reliability of survey about immunization barriers in Minnesota. Should primary care physicians take care of diabetes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1