Improving prescription documentation in the ambulatory setting.

Family practice research journal Pub Date : 1992-12-01
L G Miller, C C Matson, J C Rogers
{"title":"Improving prescription documentation in the ambulatory setting.","authors":"L G Miller,&nbsp;C C Matson,&nbsp;J C Rogers","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Use of a standard prescription pad, although it adequately meets the needs of drug delivery, requires the physician to document prescribed medications separately in the medical record. Failure to do so may lead to under-recognition of problems of potential drug interactions and adverse drug reactions, delays in prescription refills, and other areas of quality of care, especially in a setting where multiple physicians may be involved in the care of a patient. Of 83 prescriptions written in a primary care clinic, only 11 (13%) were noted on the chart medication form when physicians used prescription pads. Implementation of a \"one-write\" noncarbon prescription form that generated an instant copy increased prescription documentation to 83% (49 of 59 prescriptions) (x2 = 68.86; p < 0.005) over a one-week period. In a follow-up study conducted approximately 3.5 years after the initial intervention, use of the \"one-write\" form had maintained at 82% prescription documentation (32 of 39) prescriptions) (x2 = 52.05; p < 0.005). A \"one-write\" copy system could improve clinical care by improving medication documentation in the medical record.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"12 4","pages":"421-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Use of a standard prescription pad, although it adequately meets the needs of drug delivery, requires the physician to document prescribed medications separately in the medical record. Failure to do so may lead to under-recognition of problems of potential drug interactions and adverse drug reactions, delays in prescription refills, and other areas of quality of care, especially in a setting where multiple physicians may be involved in the care of a patient. Of 83 prescriptions written in a primary care clinic, only 11 (13%) were noted on the chart medication form when physicians used prescription pads. Implementation of a "one-write" noncarbon prescription form that generated an instant copy increased prescription documentation to 83% (49 of 59 prescriptions) (x2 = 68.86; p < 0.005) over a one-week period. In a follow-up study conducted approximately 3.5 years after the initial intervention, use of the "one-write" form had maintained at 82% prescription documentation (32 of 39) prescriptions) (x2 = 52.05; p < 0.005). A "one-write" copy system could improve clinical care by improving medication documentation in the medical record.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进门诊的处方文件。
使用标准处方垫,虽然它足以满足给药的需要,但要求医生在医疗记录中单独记录处方药物。如果做不到这一点,可能会导致对潜在药物相互作用和药物不良反应问题的认识不足,导致处方重新配药的延误,以及其他医疗质量方面的问题,特别是在多位医生可能参与患者护理的情况下。在初级保健诊所开出的83张处方中,当医生使用处方垫时,只有11张(13%)在药物表格上注明。使用“一次写入”的非碳处方表单,生成即时副本,将处方文档增加到83%(59个处方中的49个)(x2 = 68.86;P < 0.005)。在最初干预后约3.5年的随访研究中,使用“一笔书写”形式的处方文件保持在82%(39张处方中的32张)(x2 = 52.05;P < 0.005)。“一写”复制系统可以通过改善医疗记录中的药物记录来改善临床护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of survey research. Desirable features of qualitative research. Consideration of venue and vehicle in health behavior research with adolescents. Reliability of survey about immunization barriers in Minnesota. Should primary care physicians take care of diabetes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1