Responsibility and Global Justice

Mathias Risse
{"title":"Responsibility and Global Justice","authors":"Mathias Risse","doi":"10.1111/raju.12153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two traditional ways of thinking about justice at the global level either limit the applicability of justice to states - the only distributions that can be just or unjust, strictly speaking, are within the state - or else extend it to all human beings. The view I defend in On Global Justice (Risse [Risse, M., 2012]) rejects both of these approaches. Instead, my view, and thus my attempt at meeting the aforementioned challenge, acknowledges the existence of multiple grounds of justice. My purpose here is to explain what my view has to say about responsibility. First of all, I explain what my view implies about the responsibilities of the state for the realization of justice. Then I explain that in addition to obligations of justice, my view also gives rise to obligations of account‐giving. I end by sketching what all this implies for institutional reform at the global level.","PeriodicalId":375754,"journal":{"name":"Public International Law eJournal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public International Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The two traditional ways of thinking about justice at the global level either limit the applicability of justice to states - the only distributions that can be just or unjust, strictly speaking, are within the state - or else extend it to all human beings. The view I defend in On Global Justice (Risse [Risse, M., 2012]) rejects both of these approaches. Instead, my view, and thus my attempt at meeting the aforementioned challenge, acknowledges the existence of multiple grounds of justice. My purpose here is to explain what my view has to say about responsibility. First of all, I explain what my view implies about the responsibilities of the state for the realization of justice. Then I explain that in addition to obligations of justice, my view also gives rise to obligations of account‐giving. I end by sketching what all this implies for institutional reform at the global level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
责任与全球正义
在全球层面上思考正义的两种传统方式,要么限制了正义对国家的适用性——严格来说,唯一可以公正或不公正的分配是在国家内部——要么将其扩展到全人类。我在《论全球正义》(Risse [Risse, M., 2012])中捍卫的观点反对这两种方法。相反,我的观点,以及我为迎接上述挑战所作的努力,承认存在多种正义理由。我在这里的目的是解释我对责任的看法。首先,我解释了我的观点所暗示的国家在实现正义方面的责任。然后,我解释说,除了正义义务之外,我的观点也引起了交代义务。最后,我概述了这一切对全球层面的机构改革意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Dual‐Nature Thesis: Which Dualism? Legality and the Legal Relation Soldiers as Public Officials: A Moral Justification for Combatant Immunity A Pragmatic Reconstruction of Law's Claim to Authority Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1