{"title":"Eine metaphysische Geschichte des Atheismus","authors":"Vittorio Hösle","doi":"10.1524/DZPH.2009.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay explores Charles Taylor’s „A Secular Age” and focuses on following shortcomings of the work: Is the separation of the sacred and the profane a loss or an intensivation of religiosity? Does the Kantian universalist ethics not represent an increased commitment to basic Christian ideas? Must not even atheism be interpreted as a step in the self-unfolding of the divine? Taylor’s remarkable work is interpreted as being too strongly committed to Catholic personalism and not sufficiently familiar with the Protestant theological tradition. 13 Vg. V. Hösle, The Lost Prodigal Son’s Corporal Works of Mercy and the Bridegroom’s Wedding. The Religious Subtext of Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations, in: Anglia, 126 (2008), 477–502. 14 V. Hösle, Die Philosophie der ökologischen Krise, München 1991, 25 ff. 15 Ders., Moral und Politik, a. a. O., 25 ff. 16 Ebd., 293 f.","PeriodicalId":164731,"journal":{"name":"Gott als Vernunft","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gott als Vernunft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1524/DZPH.2009.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The essay explores Charles Taylor’s „A Secular Age” and focuses on following shortcomings of the work: Is the separation of the sacred and the profane a loss or an intensivation of religiosity? Does the Kantian universalist ethics not represent an increased commitment to basic Christian ideas? Must not even atheism be interpreted as a step in the self-unfolding of the divine? Taylor’s remarkable work is interpreted as being too strongly committed to Catholic personalism and not sufficiently familiar with the Protestant theological tradition. 13 Vg. V. Hösle, The Lost Prodigal Son’s Corporal Works of Mercy and the Bridegroom’s Wedding. The Religious Subtext of Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations, in: Anglia, 126 (2008), 477–502. 14 V. Hösle, Die Philosophie der ökologischen Krise, München 1991, 25 ff. 15 Ders., Moral und Politik, a. a. O., 25 ff. 16 Ebd., 293 f.
本文探讨了查尔斯·泰勒的《一个世俗的时代》,并着重指出了这部作品的以下缺点:神圣与世俗的分离是一种损失还是一种宗教虔诚的强化?康德的普遍主义伦理学不是代表了对基本基督教思想的更多承诺吗?难道连无神论都不能被解释为神性自我展开的一步吗?泰勒的杰出作品被解释为过于强烈地致力于天主教的个人主义,而对新教神学传统不够熟悉。13 Vg。V. Hösle,迷失的浪子的肉体怜悯与新郎的婚礼。查尔斯·狄更斯《远大前程》的宗教潜台词,见《安格里亚》,126(2008),477-502页。14 V。Hösle,《哲学》ökologischen,《科学》,1991,25页。15接单。,《道德与政治》,a. a. O. 25页。16 Ebd。, 293f。