Communication AssessmenT Checklist in Health: Assessment and Comparison of Web-Based Health Resources

International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare Pub Date : 2016-06-01 DOI:10.4018/IJUDH.2016070101

J. Genova, J. Bender

{"title":"Communication AssessmenT Checklist in Health: Assessment and Comparison of Web-Based Health Resources","authors":"J. Genova, J. Bender","doi":"10.4018/IJUDH.2016070101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thereisnocomprehensiveandstandardizedtoolforevaluatingthecommunicationqualityofweb resourcesforpatients.Thepurposeofthisstudywastoassessprostatecancerwebsitesusingthe CommunicationAssessmenTChecklistinHealth(CATCH)andtocomparetheresultswiththoseof theConsumerandPatientHealthInformationSectionoftheMLA(CAPHIS).CATCHisatheorybasedtoolconsistingof50elementsnestedin12concepts.Tworatersindependentlyapplieditto35 HONcertifiedwebsitescontaininginformationonprostatecancertreatment.TheCATCHsummary scoresforthesewebsiteswerethencomparedtothe2015listofcrediblehealthwebsitespublished byCAPHIS.Websitescontainedamean24.1(SD=3.6)CATCHitems.TheconceptsLanguage, Readability,Layout,TypographyandAppearancewerepresentinover80%ofsites.Content,Risk Communication,Usefulness,andScientificValuewerepresentin50%orless.CATCHprovided anoverallscoreoftheselectedsitesthatwasconsistentwithCAPHISratings.Theprostatecancer websitesevaluatedinthisstudydidnotpresenttreatmentinformationinauseful, informativeor crediblewayforpatients.Thecommunicationqualityoftheseresourcescouldbeimprovedwitha clearstrategicintentfocusedondecision-making,usingCATCHasaguidingframework.CATCH isatoolthatcanbeusedindependentlyorwithotherhealthresourceevaluationtoolstoselectthe mosttrustworthywebresourcesforhealthinformation. KeyWoRDS CAPHIS, Communication, Credibility, Internet, MLA, Patient Education, Prostate Cancer, Risk Communication, Websites","PeriodicalId":211533,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJUDH.2016070101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Thereisnocomprehensiveandstandardizedtoolforevaluatingthecommunicationqualityofweb resourcesforpatients.Thepurposeofthisstudywastoassessprostatecancerwebsitesusingthe CommunicationAssessmenTChecklistinHealth(CATCH)andtocomparetheresultswiththoseof theConsumerandPatientHealthInformationSectionoftheMLA(CAPHIS).CATCHisatheorybasedtoolconsistingof50elementsnestedin12concepts.Tworatersindependentlyapplieditto35 HONcertifiedwebsitescontaininginformationonprostatecancertreatment.TheCATCHsummary scoresforthesewebsiteswerethencomparedtothe2015listofcrediblehealthwebsitespublished byCAPHIS.Websitescontainedamean24.1(SD=3.6)CATCHitems.TheconceptsLanguage, Readability,Layout,TypographyandAppearancewerepresentinover80%ofsites.Content,Risk Communication,Usefulness,andScientificValuewerepresentin50%orless.CATCHprovided anoverallscoreoftheselectedsitesthatwasconsistentwithCAPHISratings.Theprostatecancer websitesevaluatedinthisstudydidnotpresenttreatmentinformationinauseful, informativeor crediblewayforpatients.Thecommunicationqualityoftheseresourcescouldbeimprovedwitha clearstrategicintentfocusedondecision-making,usingCATCHasaguidingframework.CATCH isatoolthatcanbeusedindependentlyorwithotherhealthresourceevaluationtoolstoselectthe mosttrustworthywebresourcesforhealthinformation. KeyWoRDS CAPHIS, Communication, Credibility, Internet, MLA, Patient Education, Prostate Cancer, Risk Communication, Websites

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

健康沟通评估清单:基于网络的健康资源评估与比较

Thereisnocomprehensiveandstandardizedtoolforevaluatingthecommunicationqualityofweb resourcesforpatients。Thepurposeofthisstudywastoassessprostatecancerwebsitesusingthe CommunicationAssessmenTChecklistinHealth(CATCH)andtocomparetheresultswiththoseof theConsumerandPatientHealthInformationSectionoftheMLA(CAPHIS).CATCHisatheorybasedtoolconsistingof50elementsnestedin12concepts。Tworatersindependentlyapplieditto35 HONcertifiedwebsitescontaininginformationonprostatecancertreatment。TheCATCHsummary scoresforthesewebsiteswerethencomparedtothe2015listofcrediblehealthwebsitespublished byCAPHIS.Websitescontainedamean24.1(SD=3.6)CATCHitems。TheconceptsLanguage，可读性，Layout，TypographyandAppearancewerepresentinover80%ofsites。Content，Risk通讯，Usefulness，andScientificValuewerepresentin50%orless。CATCHprovided anoverallscoreoftheselectedsitesthatwasconsistentwithCAPHISratings。Theprostatecancer websitesevaluatedinthisstudydidnotpresenttreatmentinformationinauseful, informativeor crediblewayforpatients。Thecommunicationqualityoftheseresourcescouldbeimprovedwitha clearstrategicintentfocusedondecision-making，usingCATCHasaguidingframework。CATCH isatoolthatcanbeusedindependentlyorwithotherhealthresourceevaluationtoolstoselectthe mosttrustworthywebresourcesforhealthinformation。关键词CAPHIS，沟通，可信度，互联网，MLA，患者教育，前列腺癌，风险沟通，网站

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare

自引率

0.00%

发文量