Patient engagement works: Patient and researcher experiences of patient partnership in primary healthcare research

D. Howse, A. Delahunty-Pike, Olivier Dumont-Samson, Mathieu Bisson, Mireille Lambert, S. Doucet, M. Chouinard, C. Hudon, Cathy J. Scott, Fred Burge, Linda Wilhelm, Mike Warren, J. Porter, Charlotte Schwarz, Donna Rubenstein, André Gaudreau
{"title":"Patient engagement works: Patient and researcher experiences of patient partnership in primary healthcare research","authors":"D. Howse, A. Delahunty-Pike, Olivier Dumont-Samson, Mathieu Bisson, Mireille Lambert, S. Doucet, M. Chouinard, C. Hudon, Cathy J. Scott, Fred Burge, Linda Wilhelm, Mike Warren, J. Porter, Charlotte Schwarz, Donna Rubenstein, André Gaudreau","doi":"10.1370/afm.20.s1.2908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Health researchers are increasingly engaging patients and their families as partners in the research process, from inception to knowledge translation. The trend toward ‘patient - oriented’ research is encouraged by a growing view that studies which integrate the patient perspective will make better use of resources to produce more relevant evidence that can be more easily translated to clinical settings. While there is an emerging literature on best practices, challenges, and learnings related to patient engagement (PE), few studies consider the experiences of patient partners (PP) and researchers in the same project. This presentation will present PP and researcher experiences of PE, highlighting important similarities and differences and proposing recommendations. Objectives: To characterize PE experience from the perspective of researchers and PP working together on the same research program, PriCARE; to identify successes and challenges; to ascertain contributions of PE in health research. Study Design: Qualitative. Setting or Dataset: This study was conducted within the larger 5-province PriCARE study examining a nurse-led case management intervention for primary care patients with complex needs. Population studied: 22 members of the study team (7 PP, 8 coordinators, 2 co-investigators, 5 principal investigators). Methods: Data collection: In-depth interviews using guides co-created by researchers and PP covering topics such as PE-related training and knowledge, and reflections on PE processes and impact. Research assistants external to the PriCARE study conducted interviews, transcribed researcher interviews, and generated a summary of PP interviews. Analysis: Data were analyzed thematically using a coding framework that was co-developed with PP. Outcome Measures: Researcher and patient experiences of PE, PP contributions to health research. Results: All team members need PE training at the beginning","PeriodicalId":115130,"journal":{"name":"Patient Engagement","volume":"CE-23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Health researchers are increasingly engaging patients and their families as partners in the research process, from inception to knowledge translation. The trend toward ‘patient - oriented’ research is encouraged by a growing view that studies which integrate the patient perspective will make better use of resources to produce more relevant evidence that can be more easily translated to clinical settings. While there is an emerging literature on best practices, challenges, and learnings related to patient engagement (PE), few studies consider the experiences of patient partners (PP) and researchers in the same project. This presentation will present PP and researcher experiences of PE, highlighting important similarities and differences and proposing recommendations. Objectives: To characterize PE experience from the perspective of researchers and PP working together on the same research program, PriCARE; to identify successes and challenges; to ascertain contributions of PE in health research. Study Design: Qualitative. Setting or Dataset: This study was conducted within the larger 5-province PriCARE study examining a nurse-led case management intervention for primary care patients with complex needs. Population studied: 22 members of the study team (7 PP, 8 coordinators, 2 co-investigators, 5 principal investigators). Methods: Data collection: In-depth interviews using guides co-created by researchers and PP covering topics such as PE-related training and knowledge, and reflections on PE processes and impact. Research assistants external to the PriCARE study conducted interviews, transcribed researcher interviews, and generated a summary of PP interviews. Analysis: Data were analyzed thematically using a coding framework that was co-developed with PP. Outcome Measures: Researcher and patient experiences of PE, PP contributions to health research. Results: All team members need PE training at the beginning
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者参与工作:初级卫生保健研究中患者伙伴关系的患者和研究人员经验
背景:卫生研究人员越来越多地让患者及其家属作为合作伙伴参与研究过程,从开始到知识转化。越来越多的观点认为,整合患者观点的研究将更好地利用资源,产生更相关的证据,更容易转化为临床环境,这一观点鼓励了“以患者为导向”的研究趋势。虽然关于患者参与(PE)的最佳实践、挑战和学习的文献越来越多,但很少有研究考虑到同一项目中患者伴侣(PP)和研究人员的经验。本报告将介绍PP和PE研究者的经验,突出重要的异同,并提出建议。目的:从研究人员和PP共同参与同一个研究项目PriCARE的角度来描述体育体验;识别成功和挑战;以确定体育在健康研究中的贡献。研究设计:定性。背景或数据集:本研究是在较大的5个省PriCARE研究中进行的,该研究检查了护士主导的病例管理干预,用于有复杂需求的初级保健患者。研究人群:22名研究小组成员(7名PP, 8名协调员,2名共同调查员,5名主要调查员)。方法:数据收集:使用研究者和PP共同编写的指南进行深度访谈,涵盖体育相关培训和知识,以及对体育过程和影响的反思等主题。PriCARE研究的外部研究助理进行了访谈,转录了研究人员的访谈,并生成了PP访谈的摘要。分析:使用与PP共同开发的编码框架对数据进行主题分析。结果测量:PE的研究人员和患者经验,PP对健康研究的贡献。结果:所有队员在开始阶段都需要进行体育训练
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Priorities for primary care in Ontario, Canada: Results from a citizen dialogue Higher education curricula and approaches to patient engagement in research: A case study Patient trainer in postgraduate family medicine training: A quality improvement initiative Patients driving deprescribing? - Older adults’ experiences with raising medication concerns with providers. The Impact of the Patient trainer on the Integration of the Patient Engagement Approach in Family Medicine Group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1