Does Emerging Market Recognize Intangible Capital? Evidence from China

Yin Yu, Carol Padgett
{"title":"Does Emerging Market Recognize Intangible Capital? Evidence from China","authors":"Yin Yu, Carol Padgett","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2237448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging markets are characterized by rapidly changing capital structures and advancing technology; but how well is intangible capital recognized in the capital market? This paper investigates equity market valuation of firm intangible capital and asset pricing model in the Chinese A-share market. While intangible capital is recognized as a risk factor in developed markets, we want to investigate whether this is the case in an emerging market. We derive a systematic model to identify and to value firms’ intangible capital relative to that of their industry peers and competitors. In this paper, firm intangible capital effect divides into human capital (HCF), external capital (ECF), and organizational capital (OCF). Using capital market data from China, we find that the traditional asset pricing model can be statistically enhanced by the presence of intangible capital and that market is able to recognize the value of intangible capital. Portfolios with low HCF, OCF, and ECF firms systematically outperform portfolios of high HCF, OCF, ECF firms by an average of 1.43%, 12.8%, and 4.02%. As shown in time series Fama-French three factors model, we found that the risk component proxied by intangible capital is not included in the traditional asset pricing model. Also large/state owned companies react to these risk proxies more than small/private companies.","PeriodicalId":108284,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: International Financial Markets - Emerging Markets eJournal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: International Financial Markets - Emerging Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emerging markets are characterized by rapidly changing capital structures and advancing technology; but how well is intangible capital recognized in the capital market? This paper investigates equity market valuation of firm intangible capital and asset pricing model in the Chinese A-share market. While intangible capital is recognized as a risk factor in developed markets, we want to investigate whether this is the case in an emerging market. We derive a systematic model to identify and to value firms’ intangible capital relative to that of their industry peers and competitors. In this paper, firm intangible capital effect divides into human capital (HCF), external capital (ECF), and organizational capital (OCF). Using capital market data from China, we find that the traditional asset pricing model can be statistically enhanced by the presence of intangible capital and that market is able to recognize the value of intangible capital. Portfolios with low HCF, OCF, and ECF firms systematically outperform portfolios of high HCF, OCF, ECF firms by an average of 1.43%, 12.8%, and 4.02%. As shown in time series Fama-French three factors model, we found that the risk component proxied by intangible capital is not included in the traditional asset pricing model. Also large/state owned companies react to these risk proxies more than small/private companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新兴市场是否承认无形资本?来自中国的证据
新兴市场的特点是快速变化的资本结构和先进的技术;但是,资本市场对无形资本的认可程度如何呢?本文研究了中国a股市场企业无形资本的股票市场估值和资产定价模型。虽然无形资本在发达市场被认为是一个风险因素,但我们想调查的是,在新兴市场是否也是如此。我们推导了一个系统的模型来识别和评估企业相对于其行业同行和竞争对手的无形资本。本文将企业无形资本效应分为人力资本(HCF)、外部资本(ECF)和组织资本(OCF)。利用中国资本市场的数据,我们发现无形资本的存在可以在统计上增强传统的资产定价模型,并且市场能够识别无形资本的价值。低HCF、OCF和ECF公司的投资组合系统地优于高HCF、OCF和ECF公司的投资组合,平均高出1.43%、12.8%和4.02%。通过时间序列Fama-French三因素模型,我们发现传统的资产定价模型中并没有包含无形资本所代表的风险成分。此外,大型/国有企业对这些风险代理的反应比小型/私营企业更强烈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing Intra-day Patterns of Stock Market Activity FRM Financial Risk Meter for Emerging Markets The Evolution of the Earnings Distribution in a Volatile Economy: Evidence from Argentina The Effects of COVID-19 Spread on the Egyptian Exchange Sectors: Winners and Losers across Time Hierarchical PCA and Modeling Asset Correlations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1