Political Communication and Deliberative Democracy

Toni Čabraja
{"title":"Political Communication and Deliberative Democracy","authors":"Toni Čabraja","doi":"10.2478/ethemes-2022-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The problem of political abstention of voters leaves democratic institutions without content. That is why the role of political communication in the context of the essential development of democracy is becoming very relevant today. We are interested in how deliberative communication, as a model of political communication, is connected with the mobilization of voters in political processes, which is how democracy is realized. The meaning of deliberatization is based on the idea of bringing stakeholders closer to a consensus through a free and equal dialogue of political communication in the communication community. In this way, a better legitimacy of political decisions is achieved. It is a process of discursive political communication that \"creates and maintains\" the actions of the government. The research question of our article was how scientific and professional theory look at the role of deliberative communication, as a model of political communication, in the process of political participation of political stakeholders in the communication community today. We assumed (the hypothesis) that scientific theory looks optimistically at the role of deliberative communication. In the article, we used the descriptive method and the method of analysing scientific and professional texts. We carried out the research with a review of domestic and foreign editions of professional books, monographic publications, original scientific articles, and research results. We obtained data using the Cobiss and Google Scholar databases. The results of the research showed that scientific theory views deliberative communication as a promising experiment and evolution in the realization of deliberative democracy..","PeriodicalId":118717,"journal":{"name":"Economic Themes","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Themes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2022-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The problem of political abstention of voters leaves democratic institutions without content. That is why the role of political communication in the context of the essential development of democracy is becoming very relevant today. We are interested in how deliberative communication, as a model of political communication, is connected with the mobilization of voters in political processes, which is how democracy is realized. The meaning of deliberatization is based on the idea of bringing stakeholders closer to a consensus through a free and equal dialogue of political communication in the communication community. In this way, a better legitimacy of political decisions is achieved. It is a process of discursive political communication that "creates and maintains" the actions of the government. The research question of our article was how scientific and professional theory look at the role of deliberative communication, as a model of political communication, in the process of political participation of political stakeholders in the communication community today. We assumed (the hypothesis) that scientific theory looks optimistically at the role of deliberative communication. In the article, we used the descriptive method and the method of analysing scientific and professional texts. We carried out the research with a review of domestic and foreign editions of professional books, monographic publications, original scientific articles, and research results. We obtained data using the Cobiss and Google Scholar databases. The results of the research showed that scientific theory views deliberative communication as a promising experiment and evolution in the realization of deliberative democracy..
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治沟通与协商民主
选民的政治弃权问题使民主制度失去了内容。这就是为什么政治传播在民主基本发展的背景下的作用今天变得非常重要。我们感兴趣的是,作为政治交流的一种模式,协商沟通如何与政治进程中选民的动员联系起来,这就是民主如何实现的。审议的意义是基于这样一种理念,即通过在传播界进行自由、平等的政治传播对话,使利益相关者更接近于达成共识。通过这种方式,实现了政治决策的更好的合法性。它是一个“创造和维持”政府行为的话语政治传播过程。我们文章的研究问题是,科学和专业的理论如何看待协商传播作为政治传播的一种模式,在当今传播共同体中政治利益相关者的政治参与过程中的作用。我们假设(假设)科学理论乐观地看待协商沟通的作用。在本文中,我们使用了描述性的方法和分析科学和专业文本的方法。我们通过对国内外专业书籍、专著、原创科学文章和研究成果的回顾进行了研究。我们使用Cobiss和谷歌Scholar数据库获得数据。研究结果表明,科学理论将协商沟通视为实现协商民主的一次有希望的实验和演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
China - Africa Trade and Investment Relations Under the Belt and Road Initiative The Impact of Bilateral Investment Agreements on Attracting Foreign Direct Investments Are All Text News Just a Noise for Investors? Impact of Online Texts on Bitcoin Returns On the Determinants of the Bank Efficiency in the Republic of Serbia: Two-Stage Dea Approach Impact of Income and Assets Diversification on Bank Performance in Serbia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1