Differences in Evaluation of Corporate Training from the Viewpoint of the Work Position and Sector

Z. Birknerová, M. Frankovský, M. Zahatňanská, Lucia Zbihlejová
{"title":"Differences in Evaluation of Corporate Training from the Viewpoint of the Work Position and Sector","authors":"Z. Birknerová, M. Frankovský, M. Zahatňanská, Lucia Zbihlejová","doi":"10.20533/iji.1742.4712.2016.0137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contemporary knowledge society should consist of components based on knowledge, creativity and information. Reaching such level of organizations assumes a priority position of ongoing education as a natural, planned and directed part of life of any organization. Effectiveness of education in organizations is conditioned by a wide range of internal and external factors. The presented study focuses on education evaluation, particularly analysis of possibilities of determining the effectiveness of corporate training. It presents the results of verification of an own methodology SBES (Significance, Benefits, Expectations and Satisfaction), which enables specification of several indicators of corporate training evaluation. The Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation was used to extract and specify four factors: Relevance to the profession, Benefits for employees, Employee expectations, Employee satisfaction. The study also describes the specific practical application of this methodology in the context of identification and specification of the differences in evaluation of corporate training between managers and non-managerial workers, and between employees of the private and the public sector. Presented findings support the claim that managers and the public sector employees have a more intense perception of the need, significance and importance of corporate training, which is closely connected to their work, career advancement, higher financial remuneration, and interpersonal relations.","PeriodicalId":306661,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Infonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Infonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20533/iji.1742.4712.2016.0137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The contemporary knowledge society should consist of components based on knowledge, creativity and information. Reaching such level of organizations assumes a priority position of ongoing education as a natural, planned and directed part of life of any organization. Effectiveness of education in organizations is conditioned by a wide range of internal and external factors. The presented study focuses on education evaluation, particularly analysis of possibilities of determining the effectiveness of corporate training. It presents the results of verification of an own methodology SBES (Significance, Benefits, Expectations and Satisfaction), which enables specification of several indicators of corporate training evaluation. The Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation was used to extract and specify four factors: Relevance to the profession, Benefits for employees, Employee expectations, Employee satisfaction. The study also describes the specific practical application of this methodology in the context of identification and specification of the differences in evaluation of corporate training between managers and non-managerial workers, and between employees of the private and the public sector. Presented findings support the claim that managers and the public sector employees have a more intense perception of the need, significance and importance of corporate training, which is closely connected to their work, career advancement, higher financial remuneration, and interpersonal relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从岗位和行业角度看企业培训评价的差异
当代知识社会应由以知识、创造力和信息为基础的要素构成。要达到这样的组织水平,就要把持续教育作为任何组织生活中自然的、有计划的和有指导的一部分,放在优先地位。组织中教育的有效性受到广泛的内部和外部因素的制约。本研究的重点是教育评价,特别是分析确定公司培训效力的可能性。它提出了自己的方法SBES(重要性,效益,期望和满意度)的验证结果,这使得企业培训评价的几个指标具体化。采用主成分分析和方差轮换法提取并指定了四个因素:职业相关性、员工福利、员工期望、员工满意度。研究报告还说明了这一方法在确定和说明管理人员和非管理人员之间以及私营部门和公共部门雇员之间在评价公司培训方面的差异方面的具体实际应用。本文的研究结果支持以下观点,即管理者和公共部门雇员对企业培训的必要性、意义和重要性有更强烈的认识,这与他们的工作、职业发展、更高的经济报酬和人际关系密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AI Adoption for Teaching and Learning of Physics Documenting and Evaluating Educational Impact Through Program Evaluation Schooling and the Challenges of Social Upward Mobility: College Readiness Program in a Borderlands Longitudinal Study Synthesis of ERM Adaptation in Enhancing Transport Organisation’s Performance: The Case of Nigerian Transport Sector A Hybrid and Non-Formal Music Education Connecting China’s Local Family Communities and Cultures with Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1