Three Evaluation Criteria's towards a Comparison of Two Characters Segmentation Methods for Handwritten Arabic Script

F. B. Samoud, S. Maddouri, H. Amiri
{"title":"Three Evaluation Criteria's towards a Comparison of Two Characters Segmentation Methods for Handwritten Arabic Script","authors":"F. B. Samoud, S. Maddouri, H. Amiri","doi":"10.1109/ICFHR.2012.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents three evaluation criteria's for a comparison of two characters segmentation methods for handwritten Arabic words. The first segmentation method is based on a combination between the projection and the minima and maxima of the contour of the image. The second method is a combination between Hough Transform (HT) and Mathematical Morphology (MM) operators. These methods are developed, evaluated and compared with reference to IFN/ENIT-database in comparison of three evaluation criteria's. The first criterion is based on the segments positions (SP). The second criterion is based on the segments numbers (SN). The third is based on the recognition rates by Transparent Neural Network (RR).","PeriodicalId":291062,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2012.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper presents three evaluation criteria's for a comparison of two characters segmentation methods for handwritten Arabic words. The first segmentation method is based on a combination between the projection and the minima and maxima of the contour of the image. The second method is a combination between Hough Transform (HT) and Mathematical Morphology (MM) operators. These methods are developed, evaluated and compared with reference to IFN/ENIT-database in comparison of three evaluation criteria's. The first criterion is based on the segments positions (SP). The second criterion is based on the segments numbers (SN). The third is based on the recognition rates by Transparent Neural Network (RR).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种评价标准对两种手写阿拉伯文字字符分割方法的比较
本文提出了三个评价标准,用于比较两种手写阿拉伯文字符切分方法的优劣。第一种分割方法是基于投影与图像轮廓的最小值和最大值之间的组合。第二种方法是霍夫变换(HT)和数学形态学(MM)算子的结合。并参照IFN/ enit数据库对这些方法进行了开发、评价和比较,并对三个评价标准进行了比较。第一个标准是基于片段位置(SP)。第二个标准是基于段数(SN)。第三种是基于透明神经网络(Transparent Neural Network, RR)的识别率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Off-Line Features Integration for On-Line Handwriting Graphemes Modeling Improvement Analysis of Different Subspace Mixture Models in Handwriting Recognition Structural Learning for Writer Identification in Offline Handwriting A Study of Handwritten Characters by Shape Descriptors: Doping Using the Freeman Code Dynamic Programming Matching with Global Features for Online Character Recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1