Off Label Promotion Reform: A Legislative Proposal Addressing Vulnerable Patient Drug Access and Limiting Inappropriate Pharmaceutical Marketing

B. Liang, T. Mackey
{"title":"Off Label Promotion Reform: A Legislative Proposal Addressing Vulnerable Patient Drug Access and Limiting Inappropriate Pharmaceutical Marketing","authors":"B. Liang, T. Mackey","doi":"10.36646/mjlr.45.1.off-label","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Off-label promotion occurs when pharmaceutical manufacturers engage in promotion of unapproved or \"off-label\" uses of their drugs. These off label uses may lack adequate clinical data to substantiate marketing claims, have led to corporate investigations and penalties, and can endanger public health. However there is adequate evidence to suggest that off-label uses are entirely appropriate for some vulnerable patient populations, and that physicians have accepted such uses as standard. Historically, U.S. law has prohibited direct off-label promotion to physicians and patients. However, failed government guidance, industry-based litigation, and the diminished capacity of regulators to police illegal practices have had dire consequences for patient safety and the prevention of healthcare fraud and abuse. Worse still, because of these policies, vulnerable disease patients and their physicians are often unaware of appropriate off-label treatments, and the lack of information places these patients at risk. To address these concerns, we propose the creation of a targeted and regulated off-label promotion system that enables vulnerable patient populations to access life-saving treatments and simultaneously creates clear incentives to avoid inappropriate off-label promotion. This federal legislation would create FDA-targeted exemptions of off-label prohibitions for vulnerable patient populations, if certain requirements of enrollment, risk management, and pharmacovigilance are met. Any proposed off-label promotion would also be pre-reviewed by the FDA to ensure that the program was safe and properly monitored. To create incentives for appropriate off-label marketing and avoid the problem of repeat corporate offenders, additional penalties would be available without preempting other causes of action. This system of carrots and sticks would increase drug access for vulnerable patient populations while discouraging illegal marketing that could threaten patient safety and public health.","PeriodicalId":410798,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.45.1.off-label","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Off-label promotion occurs when pharmaceutical manufacturers engage in promotion of unapproved or "off-label" uses of their drugs. These off label uses may lack adequate clinical data to substantiate marketing claims, have led to corporate investigations and penalties, and can endanger public health. However there is adequate evidence to suggest that off-label uses are entirely appropriate for some vulnerable patient populations, and that physicians have accepted such uses as standard. Historically, U.S. law has prohibited direct off-label promotion to physicians and patients. However, failed government guidance, industry-based litigation, and the diminished capacity of regulators to police illegal practices have had dire consequences for patient safety and the prevention of healthcare fraud and abuse. Worse still, because of these policies, vulnerable disease patients and their physicians are often unaware of appropriate off-label treatments, and the lack of information places these patients at risk. To address these concerns, we propose the creation of a targeted and regulated off-label promotion system that enables vulnerable patient populations to access life-saving treatments and simultaneously creates clear incentives to avoid inappropriate off-label promotion. This federal legislation would create FDA-targeted exemptions of off-label prohibitions for vulnerable patient populations, if certain requirements of enrollment, risk management, and pharmacovigilance are met. Any proposed off-label promotion would also be pre-reviewed by the FDA to ensure that the program was safe and properly monitored. To create incentives for appropriate off-label marketing and avoid the problem of repeat corporate offenders, additional penalties would be available without preempting other causes of action. This system of carrots and sticks would increase drug access for vulnerable patient populations while discouraging illegal marketing that could threaten patient safety and public health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标签外促销改革:解决弱势患者药物获取和限制不当药品营销的立法建议
超说明书推广是指制药商从事推广其药品未经批准或“超说明书”使用的活动。这些标签外用途可能缺乏足够的临床数据来证实营销声明,导致公司调查和处罚,并可能危害公众健康。然而,有足够的证据表明,对于一些脆弱的患者群体来说,说明书外使用是完全合适的,而且医生已经接受了这种使用作为标准。从历史上看,美国法律禁止直接向医生和患者进行标签外促销。然而,失败的政府指导、基于行业的诉讼以及监管机构监管非法行为的能力减弱,对患者安全和预防医疗欺诈和滥用产生了可怕的后果。更糟糕的是,由于这些政策,易受伤害的病人和他们的医生往往不知道适当的标签外治疗,缺乏信息使这些病人处于危险之中。为了解决这些问题,我们建议建立一个有针对性的、受监管的说明书外推广系统,使弱势患者群体能够获得挽救生命的治疗,同时建立明确的激励机制,以避免不适当的说明书外推广。如果符合注册、风险管理和药物警戒的某些要求,该联邦立法将为易受伤害的患者群体创建fda目标的标签外禁令豁免。任何拟议的标签外推广也将由FDA预先审查,以确保该计划的安全性和适当的监控。为了鼓励适当的标签外销售和避免公司重复违规者的问题,可以在不优先考虑其他诉讼理由的情况下实行额外处罚。这种胡萝卜加大棒的制度将增加弱势患者群体获得药物的机会,同时阻止可能威胁患者安全和公共卫生的非法营销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who Gets Medication-assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, and Does It Reduce Overdose Risk? Evidence from the Rhode Island All-payer Claims Database The Architecture Behind the Malpractice Concept Guidelines Tax Evasion and Illicit Cigarettes in California: Part I – Survey Evidence on Current Behavior Regulatory Exclusivity Revision: Working to Achieve Greater Innovation in Approved New Molecular Entities Leviathan in the Commons: Biomedical Data and the State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1