A STUDY OF THE HISTORY OF THE JOCHI ULUS IN RUSSIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY (1991-2021)

A. Shakieva
{"title":"A STUDY OF THE HISTORY OF THE JOCHI ULUS IN RUSSIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY (1991-2021)","authors":"A. Shakieva","doi":"10.51943/1814-6961_2022_2_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a historiographical review of works related to the history of the medieval state of Jochi ulus in Russian historiography. In particular, after the collapse of the Soviet state, attention was paid to conceptual changes and new views in the works of Russian researchers on thetopic. Analyzing scientific works, the author introduces 4 main directions for the study of the history of the Juchi ulus in Russia at the present time. Thus, the author shows the dynamics of changing opinions on this topic and the emergence of new data and thoughts. The main sources of the article are publications and articles published during this period. The author is looking for a unique paradigm in the study of the history of the Jochi Ulus in the works of domestic researchers over the past thirty years and seeks to determine the course and degree of study of the modern topic.The work describes a cycle of new theoretical ideas concerning the history of Jochi ulus, with an analysis of the works of Russian researchers. In particular, there is a positiveassessment by researchers of the \"Ulus of Jochi\", which requires significant changes in the form of studying the history of the modern Middle Ages. In the article, the author drew attention to research works that, instead of a formational approach in the interpretation of historical facts, took a liberal direction.","PeriodicalId":159758,"journal":{"name":"History of the Homeland","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Homeland","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51943/1814-6961_2022_2_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents a historiographical review of works related to the history of the medieval state of Jochi ulus in Russian historiography. In particular, after the collapse of the Soviet state, attention was paid to conceptual changes and new views in the works of Russian researchers on thetopic. Analyzing scientific works, the author introduces 4 main directions for the study of the history of the Juchi ulus in Russia at the present time. Thus, the author shows the dynamics of changing opinions on this topic and the emergence of new data and thoughts. The main sources of the article are publications and articles published during this period. The author is looking for a unique paradigm in the study of the history of the Jochi Ulus in the works of domestic researchers over the past thirty years and seeks to determine the course and degree of study of the modern topic.The work describes a cycle of new theoretical ideas concerning the history of Jochi ulus, with an analysis of the works of Russian researchers. In particular, there is a positiveassessment by researchers of the "Ulus of Jochi", which requires significant changes in the form of studying the history of the modern Middle Ages. In the article, the author drew attention to research works that, instead of a formational approach in the interpretation of historical facts, took a liberal direction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯史学中约奇乌鲁人的历史研究(1991-2021)
这篇文章提出了一个史学回顾的作品有关的历史中世纪国家的约奇ulus在俄罗斯史学。特别是在苏联解体后,俄罗斯研究人员对这一主题的观念变化和新观点引起了人们的关注。通过对科学著作的分析,介绍了目前俄罗斯主体文化史研究的四个主要方向。因此,作者展示了关于这个话题的观点变化的动态以及新数据和新思想的出现。文章的主要来源是这一时期发表的出版物和文章。作者试图从近30年来国内学者的著作中寻找一种独特的关于约奇乌鲁斯人历史的研究范式,并试图确定这一现代课题的研究进程和程度。该工作描述了一个周期的新的理论思想,有关Jochi ulus的历史,与俄罗斯研究人员的工作分析。特别是,研究人员对“约齐乌斯”的评价是积极的,这需要在现代中世纪历史的研究形式上做出重大改变。在这篇文章中,作者指出,在历史事实的解释上,研究工作没有采取形成的方法,而是采取了自由主义的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TOBANIYAZ ALNIYAZULY -FIGHTER FOR THE FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE NEW INFORMATION ABOUT THE KIRGHIZ-KAYSAKS FROM KAZAN:ANALYSIS OF A 1796 MANUSCRIPT POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF ENVER PASHA IN THE TURKESTANNATIONAL LIBERATION MOVEMENT FAMINE IN THE URAL AND BUKEY PROVINCES IN 1921-1922 AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. TOWER (TENT) TOMBS IN THE GOLDEN HORDE AND MOGOLSTAN: HISTORICAL-CULTURAL AND WORLDVIEW CONTINUITY (X-XIV centuries)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1