Prototype of Automatic Essay Assessment and Plagiarism Detection on Mobile Learning "Molearn" Application Using GLSA Method

Julianto Lemantara, M. J. Dewiyani Sunarto, B. Hariadi, T. Sagirani, Tania Amelia
{"title":"Prototype of Automatic Essay Assessment and Plagiarism Detection on Mobile Learning \"Molearn\" Application Using GLSA Method","authors":"Julianto Lemantara, M. J. Dewiyani Sunarto, B. Hariadi, T. Sagirani, Tania Amelia","doi":"10.1109/ISRITI48646.2019.9034652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In evaluating the student’s learning outcomes, essay exams were commonly used by teachers to measure the level of student’s understanding of the learning material. However assessing essay answers was more difficult in reality because it contained teacher’s subjectivity and required a longer correction time. In addition, detecting similarity in essay answers between students also required more teacher’s efforts. In previous studies, a prototype of essay answer assessment and plagiarism detection had been successfully created. However, the prototype display still needed an improvement based on the evaluation results given by biology teachers in East Java Province as the application users. The previous prototype also still carried the Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) method which had several weaknesses. Therefore, this study aimed to produce prototypes that had better display and text similarity methods. The Generalized Latent Semantic Analysis (GLSA) method was chosen because it was able to cover the weaknesses of the LSA method. GLSA was able to detect sentences that had syntactic errors or missing common words. Based on the evaluation results, this study succeeded in producing a prototype with a better display value. The level of user satisfaction increased by 6.12%. In addition, the study succeeded in using the GLSA method as a substitute for LSA for creating better prototype essay assessment and automatic plagiarism detection.","PeriodicalId":367363,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI)","volume":"413 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRITI48646.2019.9034652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In evaluating the student’s learning outcomes, essay exams were commonly used by teachers to measure the level of student’s understanding of the learning material. However assessing essay answers was more difficult in reality because it contained teacher’s subjectivity and required a longer correction time. In addition, detecting similarity in essay answers between students also required more teacher’s efforts. In previous studies, a prototype of essay answer assessment and plagiarism detection had been successfully created. However, the prototype display still needed an improvement based on the evaluation results given by biology teachers in East Java Province as the application users. The previous prototype also still carried the Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) method which had several weaknesses. Therefore, this study aimed to produce prototypes that had better display and text similarity methods. The Generalized Latent Semantic Analysis (GLSA) method was chosen because it was able to cover the weaknesses of the LSA method. GLSA was able to detect sentences that had syntactic errors or missing common words. Based on the evaluation results, this study succeeded in producing a prototype with a better display value. The level of user satisfaction increased by 6.12%. In addition, the study succeeded in using the GLSA method as a substitute for LSA for creating better prototype essay assessment and automatic plagiarism detection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于GLSA方法的移动学习“mollearn”应用论文自动评估与抄袭检测原型
在评估学生的学习成果时,论文考试通常被教师用来衡量学生对学习材料的理解程度。然而,在现实中,作文答案的评估难度较大,因为它包含了教师的主观性,并且需要更长的修改时间。此外,发现学生之间作文答案的相似性也需要老师付出更多的努力。在以往的研究中,已经成功创建了一个论文答案评估和抄袭检测的原型。然而,根据东爪哇省生物教师作为应用用户给出的评价结果,原型显示还需要改进。先前的原型仍然采用了潜在语义分析(LSA)方法,该方法有几个缺点。因此,本研究旨在制作具有更好的显示和文本相似方法的原型。选择广义潜在语义分析(GLSA)方法是因为它能够弥补LSA方法的不足。GLSA能够检测出有句法错误或缺少常用词的句子。根据评估结果,本研究成功制作出具有较好显示价值的样机。用户满意度提升6.12%。此外,本研究成功地使用GLSA方法替代LSA方法来创建更好的原型论文评估和自动抄袭检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TrendiTex: An Intelligent Fashion Designer Pair Extraction of Aspect and Implicit Opinion Word based on its Co-occurrence in Corpus of Bahasa Indonesia Parameter Tuning of G-mapping SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) on Mobile Robot with Laser-Range Finder 360° Sensor ISRITI 2019 Committees Network Architecture Design of Indonesia Research and Education Network (IDREN)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1