Overlap in the Web Search Results of Google and Bing

J. Web Sci. Pub Date : 2016-05-10 DOI:10.1561/106.00000005
R. Agrawal, Behzad Golshan, E. Papalexakis
{"title":"Overlap in the Web Search Results of Google and Bing","authors":"R. Agrawal, Behzad Golshan, E. Papalexakis","doi":"10.1561/106.00000005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Google and Bing have emerged as the diarchy that arbitrates what documents are seen by Web searchers, particularly those desiring English language documents. We seek to study how distinctive are the top results presented to the users by the two search engines. A recent eye-tracking has shown that the web searchers decide whether to look at a document primarily based on the snippet and secondarily on the title of the document on the web search result page, and rarely based on the URL of the document. Given that the snippet and title generated by different search engines for the same document are often syntactically different, we first develop tools appropriate for conducting this study. Our empirical evaluation using these tools shows a surprising agreement in the results produced by the two engines for a wide variety of queries used in our study. Thus, this study raises the open question whether it is feasible to design a search engine that would produce results distinct from those produced by Google and Bing that the users will find helpful.","PeriodicalId":405637,"journal":{"name":"J. Web Sci.","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Web Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/106.00000005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Google and Bing have emerged as the diarchy that arbitrates what documents are seen by Web searchers, particularly those desiring English language documents. We seek to study how distinctive are the top results presented to the users by the two search engines. A recent eye-tracking has shown that the web searchers decide whether to look at a document primarily based on the snippet and secondarily on the title of the document on the web search result page, and rarely based on the URL of the document. Given that the snippet and title generated by different search engines for the same document are often syntactically different, we first develop tools appropriate for conducting this study. Our empirical evaluation using these tools shows a surprising agreement in the results produced by the two engines for a wide variety of queries used in our study. Thus, this study raises the open question whether it is feasible to design a search engine that would produce results distinct from those produced by Google and Bing that the users will find helpful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谷歌和必应的网络搜索结果重叠
谷歌(Google)和必应(Bing)的出现,决定了网络搜索者(尤其是那些需要英文文档的人)可以看到哪些文档。我们试图研究两个搜索引擎呈现给用户的结果有多不同。最近的一项眼球追踪显示,网络搜索者决定是否查看文档主要是基于网页搜索结果页面上的摘要,其次是文档的标题,很少基于文档的URL。考虑到不同搜索引擎为同一文档生成的摘要和标题在语法上往往不同,我们首先开发适合进行这项研究的工具。我们使用这些工具进行的实证评估显示,对于我们研究中使用的各种查询,这两个引擎产生的结果惊人地一致。因此,这项研究提出了一个开放的问题,即设计一个搜索引擎,它产生的结果与谷歌和必应产生的结果不同,用户会觉得有用,这是否可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relationship between User Activities and Profile Images on Twitter through Machine Learning Techniques Multi-Cultural Interlinking of Web Taxonomies with ACROSS Identity Assurance in the UK: technical implementation and legal implications under eIDAS Towards Understanding the Consumption of Video-Ads on YouTube Predicting Online Islamophobic Behavior after #ParisAttacks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1