Feature Reduction Method Comparison Towards Explainability and Efficiency in Cybersecurity Intrusion Detection Systems

Adam Lehavi, S. Kim
{"title":"Feature Reduction Method Comparison Towards Explainability and Efficiency in Cybersecurity Intrusion Detection Systems","authors":"Adam Lehavi, S. Kim","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA55696.2022.00211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the realm of cybersecurity, intrusion detection systems (IDS) detect and prevent attacks based on collected computer and network data. In recent research, IDS models have been constructed using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods such as Random Forest (RF) and deep neural networks (DNN). Feature selection (FS) can be used to construct faster, more interpretable, and more accurate models. We look at three different FS techniques; RF information gain (RF-IG), correlation feature selection using the Bat Algorithm (CFS-BA), and CFS using the Aquila Optimizer (CFS-AO). Our results show CFS-BA to be the most efficient of the FS methods, building in 55% of the time of the best RF-IG model while achieving 99.99% of its accuracy. This reinforces prior contributions attesting to CFS-BA’s accuracy while building upon the relationship between subset size, CFS score, and RF-IG score in final results.","PeriodicalId":128160,"journal":{"name":"2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA55696.2022.00211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the realm of cybersecurity, intrusion detection systems (IDS) detect and prevent attacks based on collected computer and network data. In recent research, IDS models have been constructed using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods such as Random Forest (RF) and deep neural networks (DNN). Feature selection (FS) can be used to construct faster, more interpretable, and more accurate models. We look at three different FS techniques; RF information gain (RF-IG), correlation feature selection using the Bat Algorithm (CFS-BA), and CFS using the Aquila Optimizer (CFS-AO). Our results show CFS-BA to be the most efficient of the FS methods, building in 55% of the time of the best RF-IG model while achieving 99.99% of its accuracy. This reinforces prior contributions attesting to CFS-BA’s accuracy while building upon the relationship between subset size, CFS score, and RF-IG score in final results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向网络安全入侵检测系统可解释性和效率的特征约简方法比较
在网络安全领域,入侵检测系统(IDS)基于收集的计算机和网络数据来检测和预防攻击。在最近的研究中,IDS模型已经使用机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)方法,如随机森林(RF)和深度神经网络(DNN)来构建。特征选择(FS)可用于构建更快、更可解释和更准确的模型。我们来看三种不同的FS技术;RF信息增益(RF- ig),使用Bat算法(CFS- ba)进行相关特征选择,使用Aquila优化器(CFS- ao)进行CFS。我们的研究结果表明,CFS-BA是最有效的FS方法,构建最佳RF-IG模型的时间为55%,准确率为99.99%。这加强了先前证明CFS- ba准确性的贡献,同时建立在最终结果中子集大小、CFS评分和RF-IG评分之间的关系上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approximate Orthogonal Spectral Autoencoders for Community Analysis in Social Networks DeepReject and DeepRoad: Road Condition Recognition and Classification Under Adversarial Conditions Improving Aquaculture Systems using AI: Employing predictive models for Biomass Estimation on Sonar Images ICDARTS: Improving the Stability of Cyclic DARTS Symbolic Semantic Memory in Transformer Language Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1