The participation of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in the WTO dispute settlement system

Irgel, Reinisch
{"title":"The participation of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in the WTO dispute settlement system","authors":"Irgel, Reinisch","doi":"10.1163/15718070121003482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on a particular aspect of the post-Uruguay Round trade dispute settlement system: the extent of the participation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in WTO dispute settlement. It presents this issue in a larger context of NGO representation in the WTO in general. After providing a brief summary of the present dispute settlement system, the central portion of this article will deal with the repeatedly voiced calls for a participation of NGOs in the WTO dispute settlement system. There is little doubt that in a rapidly growing global village, trade policy and other policy areas overlap more and more and thus an involvement of NGOs in the WTO dispute settlement system may be required to satisfy the need for well-informed and all-embracing decision-making. But opinions differ considerably as to whether, and how, such an active role for NGOs should be defined. Radical reformers demand standing for NGOs before WTO dispute settlement panels, whereas most scholars and policymakers would be satisfied with an extended indirect role of NGOs in panel proceedings. This article will explain the theoretical basis for this demand, examine the role NGOs currently play in WTO dispute resolution proceedings, put forward arguments for and against NGO participation, and briefly outline potential future developments.","PeriodicalId":399071,"journal":{"name":"Non-state Actors and International Law","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Non-state Actors and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718070121003482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article focuses on a particular aspect of the post-Uruguay Round trade dispute settlement system: the extent of the participation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in WTO dispute settlement. It presents this issue in a larger context of NGO representation in the WTO in general. After providing a brief summary of the present dispute settlement system, the central portion of this article will deal with the repeatedly voiced calls for a participation of NGOs in the WTO dispute settlement system. There is little doubt that in a rapidly growing global village, trade policy and other policy areas overlap more and more and thus an involvement of NGOs in the WTO dispute settlement system may be required to satisfy the need for well-informed and all-embracing decision-making. But opinions differ considerably as to whether, and how, such an active role for NGOs should be defined. Radical reformers demand standing for NGOs before WTO dispute settlement panels, whereas most scholars and policymakers would be satisfied with an extended indirect role of NGOs in panel proceedings. This article will explain the theoretical basis for this demand, examine the role NGOs currently play in WTO dispute resolution proceedings, put forward arguments for and against NGO participation, and briefly outline potential future developments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非政府组织(ngo)在WTO争端解决机制中的参与
本文着重讨论后乌拉圭回合贸易争端解决机制的一个特殊方面:非政府组织参与世贸组织争端解决的程度。它把这个问题放在一个更大的背景下,即非政府组织在世贸组织中的代表性。在简要概述了目前的争端解决机制之后,本文的中心部分将讨论要求非政府组织参与世贸组织争端解决机制的呼声。毫无疑问,在一个迅速发展的地球村中,贸易政策和其他政策领域越来越重叠,因此可能需要非政府组织参与世贸组织的争端解决机制,以满足知情和无所不包的决策需要。但是,对于ngo的这种积极作用是否应该定义,以及如何定义,意见分歧很大。激进的改革者要求非政府组织在世贸组织争端解决小组中占有一席之地,而大多数学者和政策制定者则对非政府组织在小组程序中扩大间接作用感到满意。本文将解释这一需求的理论基础,考察非政府组织目前在WTO争端解决程序中发挥的作用,提出支持和反对非政府组织参与的理由,并简要概述未来的发展趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Privatization of Human Rights Violations – Business' Impunity or Corporate Responsibility? The Case of Human Rights Abuses and Torture in Iraq The application of customary international law by national courts: Introduction UK immigration law under attack and the direct application of article 8 ECHR by the ECJ Institutionalization of Cooperation Between Inter-Governmental Organisations and NGOs: The BSEC Experience Multinational enterprises: international codes and the challenge of `sustainable development'
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1