[Diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee joint].

G H Zhai
{"title":"[Diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee joint].","authors":"G H Zhai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From January, 1979 to May, 1989, 107 patients with problems related to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were treated in our hospital. 100 of the patients had anterior cruciate ligament injury confirmed by arthrotomy or arthroscopy. The remaining 7 patients were found to be normal either by arthroscopy or arthrotomy. 29 patients had fresh ACL injury and 71 old. All the patients had history of trauma of the knee joint. Swelling and pain in the affected knee joint took place in fresh cases and few of them complained of instability or deformity of the knee. On examination, floating patella test was positive in the majority of the fresh cases. It was shown that accurate diagnosis could be made by Lachman test rather than by conventional anterior drawer test in dealing with fresh injury, but with old ones, Lachman test didn't show the advantages. Examination under anesthesia or arthroscopy helped a lot in diagnosing fresh ACL injury. Anterior drawer test (ADT) was significant in determining the existence of ACL injury. When ADT was positive, ACL injury was found in the majority of the cases, however, injured ACL couldn't be ruled out by negative ADT only. Positive valgus stress test on 0 degrees position suggests possibility of ACL injury, even ADT was negative. Despite the negative anterior drawer test positive posterior drawer test on three directions indicated the injury of the posterior cruciate ligament and the anterior cruciate ligament. The positive rate of ADT was higher than that of pivot shift test in dealing with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Positive pivot shift test suggests ACL injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":23966,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","volume":"30 1","pages":"10-3, 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From January, 1979 to May, 1989, 107 patients with problems related to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were treated in our hospital. 100 of the patients had anterior cruciate ligament injury confirmed by arthrotomy or arthroscopy. The remaining 7 patients were found to be normal either by arthroscopy or arthrotomy. 29 patients had fresh ACL injury and 71 old. All the patients had history of trauma of the knee joint. Swelling and pain in the affected knee joint took place in fresh cases and few of them complained of instability or deformity of the knee. On examination, floating patella test was positive in the majority of the fresh cases. It was shown that accurate diagnosis could be made by Lachman test rather than by conventional anterior drawer test in dealing with fresh injury, but with old ones, Lachman test didn't show the advantages. Examination under anesthesia or arthroscopy helped a lot in diagnosing fresh ACL injury. Anterior drawer test (ADT) was significant in determining the existence of ACL injury. When ADT was positive, ACL injury was found in the majority of the cases, however, injured ACL couldn't be ruled out by negative ADT only. Positive valgus stress test on 0 degrees position suggests possibility of ACL injury, even ADT was negative. Despite the negative anterior drawer test positive posterior drawer test on three directions indicated the injury of the posterior cruciate ligament and the anterior cruciate ligament. The positive rate of ADT was higher than that of pivot shift test in dealing with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Positive pivot shift test suggests ACL injury.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的诊断。
自1979年1月至1989年5月,我院共收治前交叉韧带(ACL)相关问题患者107例。经关节切开术或关节镜检查证实前交叉韧带损伤100例。其余7例经关节镜或关节切开术检查均正常。新生前交叉韧带损伤29例,老年前交叉韧带损伤71例。所有患者均有膝关节外伤史。受影响的膝关节肿胀和疼痛发生在新病例中,很少有人抱怨膝关节不稳定或畸形。经检查,大多数新鲜病例的浮动髌骨试验阳性。结果表明,在处理新发损伤时,Lachman试验比传统的前抽屉试验更能准确诊断,但在处理旧发损伤时,Lachman试验没有表现出优势。麻醉或关节镜下检查对新发前交叉韧带损伤的诊断有很大帮助。前抽屉试验(ADT)对判断前交叉韧带是否存在损伤具有重要意义。当ADT呈阳性时,大多数病例均出现ACL损伤,但仅凭ADT阴性不能排除ACL损伤。0度位外翻应力测试阳性提示前交叉韧带损伤的可能性,即使ADT阴性。前抽屉试验阴性,后抽屉试验阳性,三个方向均提示前交叉韧带和后交叉韧带损伤。在处理前交叉韧带损伤时,ADT的阳性率高于枢轴移位试验。枢轴移位试验阳性提示前交叉韧带损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The technical difficulties and surgical key points of laparoscopic radical resection for perhilar cholangiocarcinoma]. [A clinical cohort study of split and whole liver transplantations]. [Efficacy analysis of surgical combined with postoperative adjuvant therapy for T3 gallbladder carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study]. [Application of augmented reality navigation combined with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging technology in the accurate guidance of laparoscopic anatomical segment 8 liver resection]. [The comparison between endoscopic and surgical treatment of delayed iatrogenic bile duct injury by propensity score matching].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1