The Conflicts among Namin Faction in Sangju Region in the 18th and 19th Centuries-Focusing on the Disputes over the Order of Spirit Tablets in Okdong Seowon in Sangju

Soon-han Kim
{"title":"The Conflicts among Namin Faction in Sangju Region in the 18th and 19th Centuries-Focusing on the Disputes over the Order of Spirit Tablets in Okdong Seowon in Sangju","authors":"Soon-han Kim","doi":"10.15186/ikc.2022.08.31.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is to review the process of the disputes over the order of spirit tablets occurred in Okdong Seowon had been spread to Sangju and the Namin line seowons in Yeongnam region. The conflicts started from the activities of requesting for granting the board by Okdong Seowon in the 18th Century, and lasted for around 80 years until the early 19th Century. The houses of Hwang of Jangsu and Jeon of Okcheon in Sangju, who were descendants of the scholars enshrined in Okdong Seowon were in the middle of the conflicts, and the study summarizes the start of the disputes between both the houses and the process of their spreading and steadiness in Yeongnam region. \nT he f irst dispute s tarted when the appeal f or r equesting to grant a board for Okdong Seowon in 88(the 12th reigning year of King Jeongjo). \nT he s econd one o ccurred in t he p rocess to r ecord t he h istory o f the enshrined persons preparing for the King’s sacrificial writing after determination of g ranting the board in 89. T he t hird a ccident was the reoccurrence of the conflicts between both the houses over the method of enshrinement, gakchuk(各祝: individual enshrinement) or habchuk(合 祝: united enshrinement). \nT he s tudy f ocuses o n the fourth event. It o ccurred due to t he rearrangement of the order of spirit tablet for Saseo Jeon Sik(沙西 全湜) according to the generation instead of its original one, when repairing the temple of Okdong Seowon and returning the enshrined persons’ spirit tablets in 1804(the 4th r eigning year o f King S unjo) T hen, t he descendants of Jeon Sik enshrined additionally their ancestor’s nameplate in the temple of Donam Seowon with permission by small numbers of the staffs of Donam Seowon only. As the accident occurred without the official discussions and procedure, the conflict became exaggerated, dividing the factions into two over the responsibilities for the accident and leaving even in Saron of Namin in Sangju. The conflict lasted over one year without resolution, even spreading among the Namin line seowons in Yeongnam region. The fifth dispute started when the spirit tablet of Jeon Sik returned to the temple of Okdong Seowon with its original order by the official document by Gyeongsang Gamsa in 1808(the 8th reigning year of King Sunjo), and the house of Hwang of Jangsu opposed it fiercely and the house of Jeon of Okcheon responded to oppose the order of generation. As a result, King Gojong ordered the order of spirit tablet in the seowon should be in its original one, notifying to shut down the seowons with the board given by king following closing the private seowons in large scale at that time, and the disputes for about 80 years were resolved, finally. \nSince the th Century, even though there were differences depending on the seowons, in general, the institute of seowon changed its characteristics from the local community to focusing on the houses of literati c lass. T he d isputes over t he o rder o f spirit tablets i n Okdong Seowon could be its expansion. The academic function of seowons was decreased, while its enshrinement function was emphasized as a tool for competing power among the houses in local society and representing individual house’s socio-economic interests. In particular, hyangjeon (local house conflicts) focusing on seowons including various disputes over the order of ancestors and that of spirit tablets in seowons were largely derived from the changes of characteristics of seowons. As Okdong Seowon was originally run mainly by the descendants of the enshrined persons and became the institute granted with the board by king, the conflicts had to become more expanded in order to secure priority in running the seowon.","PeriodicalId":255388,"journal":{"name":"Institute of Korean Cultural Studies Yeungnam University","volume":"743 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute of Korean Cultural Studies Yeungnam University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15186/ikc.2022.08.31.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is to review the process of the disputes over the order of spirit tablets occurred in Okdong Seowon had been spread to Sangju and the Namin line seowons in Yeongnam region. The conflicts started from the activities of requesting for granting the board by Okdong Seowon in the 18th Century, and lasted for around 80 years until the early 19th Century. The houses of Hwang of Jangsu and Jeon of Okcheon in Sangju, who were descendants of the scholars enshrined in Okdong Seowon were in the middle of the conflicts, and the study summarizes the start of the disputes between both the houses and the process of their spreading and steadiness in Yeongnam region. T he f irst dispute s tarted when the appeal f or r equesting to grant a board for Okdong Seowon in 88(the 12th reigning year of King Jeongjo). T he s econd one o ccurred in t he p rocess to r ecord t he h istory o f the enshrined persons preparing for the King’s sacrificial writing after determination of g ranting the board in 89. T he t hird a ccident was the reoccurrence of the conflicts between both the houses over the method of enshrinement, gakchuk(各祝: individual enshrinement) or habchuk(合 祝: united enshrinement). T he s tudy f ocuses o n the fourth event. It o ccurred due to t he rearrangement of the order of spirit tablet for Saseo Jeon Sik(沙西 全湜) according to the generation instead of its original one, when repairing the temple of Okdong Seowon and returning the enshrined persons’ spirit tablets in 1804(the 4th r eigning year o f King S unjo) T hen, t he descendants of Jeon Sik enshrined additionally their ancestor’s nameplate in the temple of Donam Seowon with permission by small numbers of the staffs of Donam Seowon only. As the accident occurred without the official discussions and procedure, the conflict became exaggerated, dividing the factions into two over the responsibilities for the accident and leaving even in Saron of Namin in Sangju. The conflict lasted over one year without resolution, even spreading among the Namin line seowons in Yeongnam region. The fifth dispute started when the spirit tablet of Jeon Sik returned to the temple of Okdong Seowon with its original order by the official document by Gyeongsang Gamsa in 1808(the 8th reigning year of King Sunjo), and the house of Hwang of Jangsu opposed it fiercely and the house of Jeon of Okcheon responded to oppose the order of generation. As a result, King Gojong ordered the order of spirit tablet in the seowon should be in its original one, notifying to shut down the seowons with the board given by king following closing the private seowons in large scale at that time, and the disputes for about 80 years were resolved, finally. Since the th Century, even though there were differences depending on the seowons, in general, the institute of seowon changed its characteristics from the local community to focusing on the houses of literati c lass. T he d isputes over t he o rder o f spirit tablets i n Okdong Seowon could be its expansion. The academic function of seowons was decreased, while its enshrinement function was emphasized as a tool for competing power among the houses in local society and representing individual house’s socio-economic interests. In particular, hyangjeon (local house conflicts) focusing on seowons including various disputes over the order of ancestors and that of spirit tablets in seowons were largely derived from the changes of characteristics of seowons. As Okdong Seowon was originally run mainly by the descendants of the enshrined persons and became the institute granted with the board by king, the conflicts had to become more expanded in order to secure priority in running the seowon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18、19世纪尚州地区南民派之争——以尚州玉洞书院灵碑之争为例
此次研究是为了研究发生在玉洞书院的灵碑顺序争议扩散到岭南地区尚州和南民系书院的过程。这一矛盾从18世纪玉东书院要求授予理事会的活动开始,一直持续到19世纪初,持续了80多年。作为玉洞书院遗民的后代,尚州的长寿黄家和玉川全家处于矛盾的中心,该研究总结了两家矛盾的起因和在岭南地区扩散和稳定的过程。第一次纷争是在88年(正祖十二年)为申请设立玉洞书院而引发的。这是自1989年决定授予匾额后,在为国王的祭文做准备的供奉者的历史记录的过程中发生的第二次匾额。第三件事是,两家围绕供奉的方式再次发生冲突,分别是“单独供奉”还是“联合供奉”。本文的研究主要集中在第四个方面。o ccurred由于t他的精神平板的顺序重排Saseo全Sik(沙西全湜)根据代代替原来的一个,当修理圣殿Okdong Seowon并返回体现人的精神在1804年平板电脑(4 r王外国年o f S unjo) t母鸡,t他的后代全Sik另外供奉祖先的铭牌的殿里Donam Seowon许可的少量工作人员Donam Seowon。在没有经过正式讨论和程序的情况下发生了事故,因此,在尚州南民沙龙,双方就事故责任问题分裂为两派,出现了矛盾。这场冲突持续了1年多,并在岭南地区的南民线部队中蔓延开来,没有得到解决。第5次纷争是在1808年(顺祖8年)庆尚甘司的公文中记载的全植灵位原封不动地回到玉洞书院寺后,长寿黄氏强烈反对,而玉川全氏则反驳说反对代制。因此,高宗在当时大规模关闭私人书院后,下令将书院内的灵位牌位改为原来的牌位,并下令用国王的诏书关闭书院,长达80年的纷争终于得到了解决。从16世纪开始,书院虽然因书院的不同而有所不同,但从总体上看,书院的特点从地方社区转变为以文人为中心的住宅。在玉洞西苑,围绕“精神药片”的订购权引发的争议,有可能是扩张引起的。书院的学术功能被削弱,其祭祀功能被强调为地方社会中家族之间的权力竞争工具,代表了个体家族的社会经济利益。特别是以书院为中心的乡争,包括各种先祖顺序纠纷、书院灵位纠纷等,很大程度上是由书院特征的变化而产生的。玉洞书院原本主要由供奉者的后代经营,后来成为国王授予的学院,因此,为了确保书院的优先经营权,矛盾不断扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Characteristics of Buildings Builton the Tombs of Goguryeo by chakgo-tile The Induction and Examination of Hongmu 31 (1398)’s Bunjaegi on Slaves Sending Back to the Owners A Study on the Perspective of Confucian Classicsby Park Jang hyun Gwan-rye Trends from the periodof modern transition: Based on antique documents of Lee Joong-gu’sfive generations A study on the formation of Texas Street near Busan Station and the influx of former Soviet Bloc migrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1